'Bring On The Night'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, flaming otters, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Jeez, tommy, it's like you don't even bother to listen. If it's the president who's doing it, it is by definition following the law.
But... but... but... now I'm confused. Is there some exception to this, where we must enforce the rule of law on the president if the issue involved blowjobs?
Of course. Republicans never get blowjobs. From women.
Um... OK, is this still a country where our president... has to follow laws?
You see, that's a pre-9/11 mindset. You have to have a post-9/11 mindset.
Oh, you mean like "Of course not."(wink, wink) Don't know.
yeah. I mean, as long as they are trying to be all secret about it, you'd think that lying would be appropriate.
Speaking of wacky politics and commenting on them, Newsweek has an article on the Colbert Report.
Well, duh. Blowjobs are nonprocreative; also, they involve mouths and penises and are just icky, and nice presidents just say no. Nasty presidents get whopped upside the head with the rule of law.
It's a totally different vibe from wiretappings and warrants and email surveillance and library record scanning and cause-of-war misdirection, which do involve mouths, but only mouths saying words, not mouths touching penises (except, possibly, metaphorically).
It's like you never took a civics class, or something.
Is there some exception to this, where we must enforce the rule of law on the president if the issue involved blowjobs?
Tommyrot! THAT was a matter of MORALS! We MUST uphold this country's morals, even if it means kicking the president out of office!
England prevails!
(England prevails, leader.)
This is the voice of Fate, signing off.
Let's be fair. I cannot think of a single reason why a blowjob would improve national security, whereas I can think of scenarios in which evil ratfinkery would achieve that goal.
Then again, executing all citizens of this country whose names fall in the first half of the alphabet would undoubtedly improve national security too, because that is 150,000,000 fewer people to have to keep track of and protect.
First name or last name? Just wondering where I stand.