You'll fight, and you'll shag, and you'll hate each other till it makes you quiver, but you'll never be friends.

Spike ,'Sleeper'


Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.  

This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.


Vortex - Oct 05, 2004 10:05:01 am PDT #9077 of 10001
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

And, in all fairness to Buffy, HER MOTHER WAS DYING. She had to deal with that, take care of her, and take care of her "sister". She didn't have enough left for a relationship.


§ ita § - Oct 05, 2004 10:07:50 am PDT #9078 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I feel like Buffy was using her Slayerness as a wall between her and Riley.

I feel like her Slayerness was a wall. He had issues with it too. She didn't need to wield it so to make it true.

And that's aside from the mother dying thing.


ChiKat - Oct 05, 2004 10:13:33 am PDT #9079 of 10001
That man was going to shank me. Over an omelette. Two eggs and a slice of government cheese. Is that what my life is worth?

And, in all fairness to Buffy, HER MOTHER WAS DYING. She had to deal with that, take care of her, and take care of her "sister". She didn't have enough left for a relationship.

Oh, I'm not blaming Buffy for the way she felt. The way she felt was the way she felt. She was majorly stressed and Riley was a bit needy and whiny there at the end. Especially when she could have used some support from him and she didn't get it.

I feel like her Slayerness was a wall. He had issues with it too.

Oh, yes. He had some major issues with her being stronger than him and it taking away time/focus/energy from him. No question.

She didn't need to wield it so to make it true.

My question is, did she wield it? Or did she take advantage of something that was already there?


Matt the Bruins fan - Oct 05, 2004 10:13:37 am PDT #9080 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Victor, Thessaly, so sorry to hear about the ferret.

I liked early Riley too, though I was sufficiently disenchanted by his later Clenchy McLockjaw military stuff that by the time of "The Yoko Factor" I was rooting for Angel to kill him.


§ ita § - Oct 05, 2004 10:15:20 am PDT #9081 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

My question is, did she wield it? Or did she take advantage of something that was already there?

I think neither. It's something like, in my view, did she wield the death of her mother, or did she take advantage of what was already there? Also, when did she stop beating her wife?

I don't presume her guilty. I think she tried, and failed.


ChiKat - Oct 05, 2004 10:19:17 am PDT #9082 of 10001
That man was going to shank me. Over an omelette. Two eggs and a slice of government cheese. Is that what my life is worth?

I think she tried, and failed.

I can get on board that wagon. I think, ultimately, Buffy and Riley were a good pair with bad timing. They both had some growing up to do in order to make the relationship work. If they had met 3 years later, it may have worked out.


-t - Oct 05, 2004 10:20:03 am PDT #9083 of 10001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

My question is, did she wield it? Or did she take advantage of something that was already there?

i'm not sure what you mean. Did she take their Slayer issues and add them to her protective layers so he couldn't get close to her? Emphasize their problems rather than try to overcome them? Is that the question?


ChiKat - Oct 05, 2004 10:21:19 am PDT #9084 of 10001
That man was going to shank me. Over an omelette. Two eggs and a slice of government cheese. Is that what my life is worth?

Did she take their Slayer issues and add them to her protective layers so he couldn't get close to her? Emphasize their problems rather than try to overcome them? Is that the question?

Yes, that's exactly what I mean.


Topic!Cindy - Oct 05, 2004 10:22:09 am PDT #9085 of 10001
What is even happening?

Now that you say that, Cindy, I'm not sure she ever said it to him. I guess I was drawing conclusions after her "run after him if you love him" conversation with Xander.

I remember him saying it to her (or at least saying it in other words) two times. The first was in The Yoko Factor, when she had to unruffle his feathers after their encounters with Angel. When he said it, that time, her face indicated she felt similarly, or at least was fairly thrilled he'd said it. He also said it, or something akin to it, during The Replacement, when they were riding over to Xander's new place, to figure out the two Xander mess. She seemed rather happy that time, too.

I think there was a time in which (maybe) Buffy could have grown to love Riley, eventually. I don't think she was *there* yet. He was. After everything that happened, I don't think the potential was the same.


§ ita § - Oct 05, 2004 10:24:11 am PDT #9086 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

He was.

I disagree. Just because he said he loved her, doesn't mean he was aiming anything workable in her direction.