I feel like by saying something, I've contributed to these negative effects on his career. Which is ridiculous. But it still upsets me. I don't want to see that kind of thing happen to him, and yet he's brought it upon himself.

I didn't realize he'd become a deal. (Maybe not a huge deal yet, but, funny how people expand when you try not to think about them, ever.)

I super hate this all the way around, you guys. I hate that people I care about -- MY people -- were hurt and don't feel safe here. I hate that I didn't know what was happening and my silence contributed to people feeling unsafe. And I hate that someone I've always liked is not who I thought he was.

What Steph said.

I feel like by saying something, I've contributed to these negative effects on his career. Which is ridiculous. But it still upsets me. I don't want to see that kind of thing happen to him, and yet he's brought it upon himself.

Dana, I get it, I really do. But thing is, he HAS brought this on himself. All of it. I've been watching him, professionally speaking, for well over a year—I watched how he behaved at cons, shunning people in favor of those he thought were higher up the professional food chain, and inflating his own accomplishments at the expense of others.

To wit: as an editor, he had a tendency to take the spotlight for himself rather than shining it on the authors whose work he'd acquired. This, to me, is a pretty big faux pas and as an author, if he'd done this to me, no way would I have ever submitted to him again. I also know there were a lot of seasoned professionals who were giving him the hairy side-eye for the behavior, but much like the behavior he was chided for on the board, a lot of people put it down to his inexperience and youthful exuberance and that he'd grow out of it.

Obviously, he didn't and I kept watching, thinking that at some point, he would have burned one bridge too many.

I just didn't think it would happen with the force of a box of C4 detonating.

I feel like by saying something, I've contributed to these negative effects on his career.

Absolutely not. He did that to himself when he decided to act like a dick.

edit: Or what Barb said.

Count me in as another person who has been silent, but reading, following links, listening.

First, people kicking themselves because they've never seen anything questionable in his behavior -- please don't be harsh on yourselves. I too liked Sunil, quite a bit. But I worked in three DV shelters, and this is the 2nd guy this year whose behavior was abusive and has caught me utterly flatfooted, and left me aghast.

I am sadly in support of a ban. Look, I'm sincerely not being mememe, but I am looking at this through the lens of my experience. As someone who has engaged in destructive behaviors that hurt people I cared for, and who was given multiple chances to stop engaging in those behaviors, it was not until people I loved and respected decided that although they cared for me and wished me well in my struggles, they no longer could be an active part of my life while I was engaging in those behaviors.

It was, and continues to be, very painful. But it worked for me. To see all these people I respected and valued shun me -- my anger and fear, my justifications and rationalizations received a sledgehammer blow, and I was left naked and alone in a spotlight. It. Was. Horrible.

But it was necessary, and I know now it was incredibly hard on those who needed to remove me from their lives unless and until I demonstrated lasting change.

So I can say I feel empathy and compassion towards Sunil. I really do. But empathy doesn't mean a blank check. You have to earn forgiveness through actively and consistently analyzing and changing your behavior. Once you've shattered trust, it is very, very hard to get it back, and sometimes, it is irrevocably broken.

I thought long and hard about remaining silent and either going along with a concensus, or quietly voting. But if I remained silent, if I didn't come out and say "I have not seen this behavior, but I believe you" to the people who have been hurt by his actions, then I'd be turning my back on facing hard emotional truths.

And this year, for me, has been all about facing hard emotional truths in all of my relationships.

Behavior has consequences. I truly hope that this is a come to Jesus moment for Sunil. I think (but I can't truly know) that he didn't mean to hurt anyone -- but he did, over and over, despite being told that these behaviors were harmful.

BTDT.

But being genuinely sorry doesn't mean shit in this kind of situation; demonstrating, over and over and over again, that you are no longer a toxic person is the only thing that really matters.

I am sorry this is so rambling and long. I hope no one takes this as a self-congratulatory or...god, I don't even know. Takes this wrong. This year I've become fairly terrified and very cautious about talking when I should be listening.

I'm sick with anxiety to press post, but I will. And then I'll go back to listening again, in the sincere hope that this painful incident will eventually result in a positive.

ETA: Fixed crazy typos.

I hate that people I care about -- MY people -- were hurt and don't feel safe here. I hate that I didn't know what was happening and my silence contributed to people feeling unsafe.

I hate all that, and I hate that I couldn't trust my instincts, and/or even effectively express my instincts.

I am so shocked right now. That said, he needs to go. Several members of our community have spoken up with truly horrendous stories and that is all I personally need to know. I sincerely hope that he learns and grows from this and apparently other situations stemming from his actions. Wow. Just, wow. I'm sorry to my fellow Buffistae who've suffered.

I hope you can get rid of any guilt feelings quickly and easily, Dana. You have done nothing wrong, not even a little bit.

I'm glad you posted that Strix. It's a valuable perspective. And I'm just glad to hear how you are doing, incidentally.

I think voting to suspend the rules is the right thing to do. I'm sorry we didn't see that we had cause to take action before now.

Would it be a good idea to remove him from the FB group now so that if there's anyone who feels the need to share or chime in out of his view we have a place to do that? I don't want to split up the discussion but it strikes me that might be helpful in some ways.