Someone connected to ME or a network says, before the start of the season, "X is joining/leaving the show." That fact is a) publicized in some way (radio spot, tv promo, poster, etc.) or b) shows up in a professional publication (official website, TV Guide ad, article in the Albany Times Union). If this happens, it's okay to go ahead and talk about the fact that X is joining/leaving the show.
As I understand it: Production Company or Network announces, through press release (and this, BTW, I believe happened when the WB annouced their fall schedules, though I could Nilly newspaper articles from May to verify) or promotes through radio, tv, or web spots (by which I mean ads on major websites such as MSN, which I have seen), casting changes.
I would NOT included any newsletters sent by the networks, just press releases and promotional material.
Just wait ... Jim'll come back and be all "IN EVERY THREAD FUCKOS. EVEN IF IT'S JUST WORD FROM AUNT ETHEL IN SPRINGFIELD."
Aunt Ethel is never wrong.
Aunt Ethel is going to BE on Angel.
With her lover, Carrot Top.
Just wait ... Jim'll come back and be all "IN EVERY THREAD FUCKOS. EVEN IF IT'S JUST WORD FROM AUNT ETHEL IN SPRINGFIELD."
"What have you people done to my proposal???"
Sean
Discussion boards, warnerbros.com, fan sites, none of those would count. Interviews would not count, but ad copy, including quotes, would.
Just as quantifiable as "on air promo," and actually doesn't all that radically change the current policy or definition, as far as I can see.
Burrell
That major casting spoilers (to the main cast only, not recurring or guest), which are being advertised by Fox, the WB or ME in press advertising or their official website, are no longer spoilers
I feel that a straightforward reading of these lines ("advertising" = advertisements; official websites != fansites) leaves little to no room for misunderstanding.
Guys, you don't even agree NOW what "officially published by the network or production company" means. AKA, it is NOT obvious.
If the website is a kosher source for information Lorne's head would NOT have been a spoiler.
Or is it a kosher source for major casting information but not minor casting information? THAT would prove tricky.
Aunt Ethel is going to BE on Angel.
With her lover, Carrot Top.
So. Did. Not. Need. That. Image.
Well we have not done anything to it. Because it is Jim's proposal and we can only make suggestions. Writing a proposal under these circumstances is a little like having sex with an audience standing there shouting out helpful suggestions.
So. Did. Not. Need. That. Image.
You don't know what Aunt Ethel looks like.
If the website is a kosher source for information Lorne's head would NOT have been a spoiler.
Lorne's head on a platter was not a change to the regular cast over the summer, and therefore WOULD have been a spoiler.
If the website is a kosher source for information Lorne's head would NOT have been a spoiler.
The proposal is only about a) casting changes for b) regulars over c) the summer. (Well, the summer thing is an addition of Cindy's, but the first two are solid.) So because Lorne wasn't a regular at that time, and there was no casting change involved, it would still have been a spoiler.