If the website is a kosher source for information Lorne's head would NOT have been a spoiler.
Lorne's head on a platter was not a change to the regular cast over the summer, and therefore WOULD have been a spoiler.
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
If the website is a kosher source for information Lorne's head would NOT have been a spoiler.
Lorne's head on a platter was not a change to the regular cast over the summer, and therefore WOULD have been a spoiler.
If the website is a kosher source for information Lorne's head would NOT have been a spoiler.
The proposal is only about a) casting changes for b) regulars over c) the summer. (Well, the summer thing is an addition of Cindy's, but the first two are solid.) So because Lorne wasn't a regular at that time, and there was no casting change involved, it would still have been a spoiler.
You don't know what Aunt Ethel looks like.
If she's on top of Angel with Carrot Top, I don't need to.
If she's on top of Angel with Carrot Top, I don't need to.
When I said "on Angel" I meant the show.
Because Aunt Ethel with Carrot Top is much better than a threesome.
When I said "on Angel" I meant the show.
Oh sure, tell me that now.
Guys, you don't even agree NOW what "officially published by the network or production company" means. AKA, it is NOT obvious.
Trudy, I appreciate your position on this, but the differences in our definitions are minor, and part of the discussion we are having right now is to hash out the specifics.
Most of the definitions presented by the people here have been very close to identical, so saying we "can't agree" and that the definition is "not obvious" is kind of blowing things out of proportion.
Alright, not a spoiler.
Telling people they can discuss X from the website and not Y will prove tricky.
And the disagreement is because the wording has not completely gelled. Different wordings suggest slightly different ranges of permissable sources.
Maybe we should stick to Jims orginal wording as far as source.
"That major casting spoilers (to the main cast only, not recurring or guest), which are being advertised by Fox, the WB or ME in press advertising or their official website, are no longer spoilers, and should be discussed in the show threads. This includes cast additions or departures. The Main Cast are those characters who appear in the opening credit
Advertised by ... in press advertising or their official websites.
OK - that is absolutely unambiguous.
I would still change "Fox, the WB or ME" to the "The network broadcasting the show, or the production company creating and writing the show" - so that if Angel moves to HBO that is included, and if ME changes it's name to "Mutant Fluffy Bunnies" that is still covered.
And of course include that this applies only to betwen season spoilers.
So the propose change is pretty close to Cindy's"
"That major casting spoilers (to the main cast only, not recurring or guest), which are being advertised byFox, the WB or MEthe network broadcasting the show or the production company responsible for creating and writing the show in press advertising or their official website, are no longer spoilers, and should be discussed in the show threads. This includes cast additions or departures. The Main Cast are those characters who appear in the opening credit. Information is only considered non-spoiler if released at least one month prior to the season in which the casting change takes place.
Most of the definitions presented by the people here have been very close to identical, so saying we "can't agree" and that the definition is "not obvious" is kind of blowing things out of proportion.
I don't think it is. We have a hard enough time with the policy as it now stands and it is VERY clear.
Telling people they can discuss X from the website and not Y will prove tricky.
I think "official copy" would cover it. That's very specifically not boards and chat rooms.
But I for one would be willing to forego web advertising, just to be safe.