Aunt Ethel is going to BE on Angel.
With her lover, Carrot Top.
So. Did. Not. Need. That. Image.
'Sleeper'
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Aunt Ethel is going to BE on Angel.
With her lover, Carrot Top.
So. Did. Not. Need. That. Image.
Well we have not done anything to it. Because it is Jim's proposal and we can only make suggestions. Writing a proposal under these circumstances is a little like having sex with an audience standing there shouting out helpful suggestions.
So. Did. Not. Need. That. Image.
You don't know what Aunt Ethel looks like.
If the website is a kosher source for information Lorne's head would NOT have been a spoiler.
Lorne's head on a platter was not a change to the regular cast over the summer, and therefore WOULD have been a spoiler.
If the website is a kosher source for information Lorne's head would NOT have been a spoiler.
The proposal is only about a) casting changes for b) regulars over c) the summer. (Well, the summer thing is an addition of Cindy's, but the first two are solid.) So because Lorne wasn't a regular at that time, and there was no casting change involved, it would still have been a spoiler.
You don't know what Aunt Ethel looks like.
If she's on top of Angel with Carrot Top, I don't need to.
If she's on top of Angel with Carrot Top, I don't need to.
When I said "on Angel" I meant the show.
Because Aunt Ethel with Carrot Top is much better than a threesome.
When I said "on Angel" I meant the show.
Oh sure, tell me that now.
Guys, you don't even agree NOW what "officially published by the network or production company" means. AKA, it is NOT obvious.
Trudy, I appreciate your position on this, but the differences in our definitions are minor, and part of the discussion we are having right now is to hash out the specifics.
Most of the definitions presented by the people here have been very close to identical, so saying we "can't agree" and that the definition is "not obvious" is kind of blowing things out of proportion.
Alright, not a spoiler.
Telling people they can discuss X from the website and not Y will prove tricky.