So far, the consensus is No Consensus.
Which is as it should be.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
So far, the consensus is No Consensus.
Which is as it should be.
I don't mean to bring up a sore topic, but could someone please explain this preferential voting business that seems to have caused such a controversy back in the day?
The best explanation I've come up with is: imagine a large room, with a banner on the wall somewhere for each option. Everyone goes and stands by their favourite option. Then the least popular option gets its banner torn down and everyone by that poster is told to pick again. So they all go off to new banners (or say they don't like any of the other posters, and go sit in the middle of the floor). We count up numbers again, and the least popular option gets its banner torn down too and everyone there gets shooed off to their next favourite option.
You keep doing this until there are only two options left. Whichever one has the most people voting for it wins. Only, it all happens instantly.
Polter-Cow, it was a voting system from hell that an unholy alliance of actuaries and Australians tried to foist upon our great republic.
Preferential...
t stops capering and does the zombie walk My preference is braaaaaiiins...
Polter-Cow, it was a voting system from hell that an unholy alliance of actuaries and Australians tried to foist upon our great republic.
In the event, I don't recall if we've even had a vote where it would be an issue. I think we've only ever had two options for any question put to a vote.
Natter 27: And don't think I won't turn this car around.
Oops, I didn't know this....
Hee. It's okay. Sorry to involve you in an in-joke you didn't know anything about--it's just that there was a bloody flamewar fought over preferential voting back when we were setting up the voting system.
this is happening every thread title now. I think I'd like to see us start voting on the things
This gets my vote. Well, either voting, or using some other decision-making process that doesn't require 100 posts to scroll past in Bureau every time.
Natter 27: An Unholy Alliance of Actuaries and Australians
Natter 27: No consensus.