Natter 27: And don't think I won't turn this car around.
Like any of that's enough to fight the Dark Master. Bator.
Xander ,'Lessons'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
brenda m - Aug 20, 2004 7:48:50 am PDT #1912 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Katie M - Aug 20, 2004 7:54:20 am PDT #1913 of 10001
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies
Oops, I didn't know this....
Hee. It's okay. Sorry to involve you in an in-joke you didn't know anything about--it's just that there was a bloody flamewar fought over preferential voting back when we were setting up the voting system.
Lyra Jane - Aug 20, 2004 7:57:05 am PDT #1914 of 10001
Up with the sun
this is happening every thread title now. I think I'd like to see us start voting on the things
This gets my vote. Well, either voting, or using some other decision-making process that doesn't require 100 posts to scroll past in Bureau every time.
Topic!Cindy - Aug 20, 2004 8:03:01 am PDT #1915 of 10001
What is even happening?
Natter 27: An Unholy Alliance of Actuaries and Australians
Kristen - Aug 20, 2004 8:06:52 am PDT #1916 of 10001
Natter 27: No consensus.
Nora Deirdre - Aug 20, 2004 8:09:12 am PDT #1917 of 10001
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)
no consensus
juliana - Aug 20, 2004 8:14:41 am PDT #1918 of 10001
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…
I consense for No Consensus
DavidS - Aug 20, 2004 8:16:30 am PDT #1919 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
I'm for DXM picking.
There was a kind of consensus about the one like "Didn't we already do the three squared one before?" (however that was phrased)
I remember four or five people liking that, which is pretty nearly a landslide in thread title selection. Seems a shame to waste a good number like 27 on "No Consensus." Soon we're going to get to numbers which have no cultural associations whatsoever. Or...one association like 57 and Heinz.
billytea - Aug 20, 2004 8:20:05 am PDT #1920 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
Natter 27: An Unholy Alliance of Actuaries and Australians
I just changed my tag. Now I have to go change it again?
Signed, the Unholy Alliance
Soon we're going to get to numbers which have no cultural associations whatsoever.
I'm looking forward to this. The numerical references are getting old, and kind of forced.
Jesse - Aug 20, 2004 8:26:16 am PDT #1921 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Come on, David, the people LOVE No consensus. Live it, love it.