Polter-Cow, it was a voting system from hell that an unholy alliance of actuaries and Australians tried to foist upon our great republic.
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Preferential...
t stops capering and does the zombie walk My preference is braaaaaiiins...
Polter-Cow, it was a voting system from hell that an unholy alliance of actuaries and Australians tried to foist upon our great republic.
In the event, I don't recall if we've even had a vote where it would be an issue. I think we've only ever had two options for any question put to a vote.
Natter 27: And don't think I won't turn this car around.
Oops, I didn't know this....
Hee. It's okay. Sorry to involve you in an in-joke you didn't know anything about--it's just that there was a bloody flamewar fought over preferential voting back when we were setting up the voting system.
this is happening every thread title now. I think I'd like to see us start voting on the things
This gets my vote. Well, either voting, or using some other decision-making process that doesn't require 100 posts to scroll past in Bureau every time.
Natter 27: An Unholy Alliance of Actuaries and Australians
Natter 27: No consensus.
no consensus
I consense for No Consensus