Natter 27: An Unholy Alliance of Actuaries and Australians
Lorne ,'Why We Fight'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Natter 27: No consensus.
no consensus
I consense for No Consensus
I'm for DXM picking.
There was a kind of consensus about the one like "Didn't we already do the three squared one before?" (however that was phrased)
I remember four or five people liking that, which is pretty nearly a landslide in thread title selection. Seems a shame to waste a good number like 27 on "No Consensus." Soon we're going to get to numbers which have no cultural associations whatsoever. Or...one association like 57 and Heinz.
Natter 27: An Unholy Alliance of Actuaries and Australians
I just changed my tag. Now I have to go change it again?
Signed, the Unholy Alliance
Soon we're going to get to numbers which have no cultural associations whatsoever.
I'm looking forward to this. The numerical references are getting old, and kind of forced.
Come on, David, the people LOVE No consensus. Live it, love it.
Jesse, what's your platform?
Everyone wins!
Tiny Buffista flags for everyone!