You know, my big sister could really beat the crap out of her. I mean, really really.

Dawn ,'Storyteller'


Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.  

This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.


Steph L. - Dec 05, 2003 3:45:59 pm PST #6724 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I interrupt to point out how much I hate this criticism of Chosen. This was said to keep women from getting the vote, to keep them out of the pulpit and public office, and the workforce, and from having a drink in goddamn public, to keep them from getting birth control, yada yada yada.

Of course there are risks, but it's worse to keep power from people to whom it rightfully belongs.

t hearting Cindy big and deep


Cindy - Dec 05, 2003 3:47:32 pm PST #6725 of 10001
Nobody

Have I mentioned what a praise whore I am? No. Well then, this is the perfect time.

On with the hearting of me, I say!


Micole - Dec 05, 2003 4:03:21 pm PST #6726 of 10001
I've been working on a song about the difference between analogy and metaphor.

::Nibbles at Cindy's tasty brain::

(Do other boards express admiration via cannibalism?)


Matt the Bruins fan - Dec 05, 2003 4:10:12 pm PST #6727 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

I don't think this was a perfect solution. I think it was the only solution, and has already done more harm than good, because in the doing, they were able to save the world.

Er, Cindy, didn't you mean more good than harm?


Cindy - Dec 05, 2003 4:11:25 pm PST #6728 of 10001
Nobody

Don't confuse me with facts when I'm drinking a nice Merlot, Matt (or Bruce, as I almost called you--who is Bruce?).

Yes, thank you. I meant it the other way around.

(Do other boards express admiration via cannibalism?)

There are other boards?


smonster - Dec 05, 2003 8:14:23 pm PST #6729 of 10001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

Ah. Misunderstanding crossed with duh-ness on my party.

They don't have anything to get beyond (that we know of).

I understood this as getting beyond their problems, not getting beyond their coping mechanisms.

Or does the message of having the power to let go of the bullshit apply only to Buffy (who is of course the whole point of the show)?

Lyra Jane gave a list here of the Scoobies getting over each of their issues.

I would say that no, we don't know that these girls have "Well, at least I can/am ____" coping mechanisms that hold them back somehow, but Joss demonstrated that each of the Scoobies did. This gets into "We don't know that the girls didn't have "Special" issues, either." The show is about Buffy, but also about things we all go through.

And, now that I think about it, one of my friends tonight (offline) reminded me of one of my particular "I'm special" issues and how it harms me. Huh. This is the part where I hear Giles in my head saying "a synchronicity bordering on predestination..."

****

A 'flutter' moment not mentioned, I think. When Tara and Willow joined hands and sent that drink machine slamming against the door.

Also, camera panning to reveal "Was it good for you?" scrawled in blood on the wall.


Volans - Dec 07, 2003 5:49:58 am PST #6730 of 10001
move out and draw fire

(puts hands up)

OK, I cede! I was pushing a little at some points of Plei's idea, in writing-workshop style, to make them stronger and hold up for a larger, less biased audience. I was doing this because I think she's got something good here, something worth thinking about and discussing. I'm not going to defend a stance I didn't take (that females should be kept down): I re-stated my position in my previous post, and it was still misunderstood. So I give up.

I'm also not attacking Plei, or Joss, or the show, just in case that was also misunderstood.


P.M. Marc - Dec 07, 2003 7:22:20 am PST #6731 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

OK, I cede! I was pushing a little at some points of Plei's idea, in writing-workshop style, to make them stronger and hold up for a larger, less biased audience. I was doing this because I think she's got something good here, something worth thinking about and discussing. I'm not going to defend a stance I didn't take (that females should be kept down): I re-stated my position in my previous post, and it was still misunderstood. So I give up.

I didn't have much of a response (because I was at work, and therefore braindead) at the time, but I still don't expect the metaphor to map exactly. I mean, given the time and desire to expand it beyond Buffy herself (and I think can be extended to Xander and Willow, but explicitly *NOT* to Spike, which is a story for another thread), I could, but, to be frank, the montage o' female empowerment wouldn't be something I touched on in anything more than an exploring-it-as-symbolism way. (In which case, I'd just say what Micole said about the sharing of power.)

This is partly because, wank or no, S7 still leaves me somewhat cold, and I'd have to rewatch large portions of it when I have other things I'd rather be doing. It's also partly because, as I said, show not called Scoobie Gang, or Potentials, show called Buffy, and so while no, it doesn't only apply to Buffy, she's still the most important POV of the show.


Cindy - Dec 07, 2003 7:53:37 am PST #6732 of 10001
Nobody

I'm not going to defend a stance I didn't take (that females should be kept down): I re-stated my position in my previous post, and it was still misunderstood. So I give up.

FWIW, I didn't think you were taking that stance. It's just that the points you were making to take your stance are similar positions to those taken by people trying to keep any group X, from getting any power Y. I agreed with a lot of what you said. I think their solution is problematic. They didn't have time. They didn't have options. It was better than the alternative (i.e. keeping the status quo and letting the world end). I am sorry I made you feel like I was putting you in a stance you don't hold. I didn't intend to.


Volans - Dec 07, 2003 8:52:20 am PST #6733 of 10001
move out and draw fire

No worries...I brought it on myself by my shorthanding of what I meant.

Show not called The Scooby Gang, true, but because it's about Buffy every character on it should reflect (or refract?) her, in one way or another. Some should be what she could become if she chooses the good path, some should be what she could become if she chooses the evil path, some should represent things she wants but can't have, some should represent parts of her, etc. Some, like Spike, seem to offer an escape from the problems of being Buffy (s6) and then reflect her heroic choices back to her (S7). So I think it's cool that Lyra Jane mapped the Idea of Plei onto some of the other characters.