Lorne: You know what they say about people who need people. Connor: They're the luckiest people in the world. Lorne: You been sneaking peeks at my Streisand collection again, Kiddo? Connor: Just kinda popped out.

'Time Bomb'


Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.  

This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.


Fiona - Jul 09, 2003 8:54:03 am PDT #3251 of 10001

It's a case where reading the script gave away something that might not have been so obvious otherwise.

Ftr, I watched on time delay, and didn't read the scripts. I missed the Giles-not-touching-things completely until I read about it here.


kat perez - Jul 09, 2003 8:56:29 am PDT #3252 of 10001
"We have trust issues." Mylar

The Giles-not-touching-things will never be as bad for me as the "I didn't get my head cut off because the Bringer had squeaky shoes."


Cindy - Jul 09, 2003 9:14:42 am PDT #3253 of 10001
Nobody

Ftr, I watched on time delay, and didn't read the scripts. I missed the Giles-not-touching-things completely until I read about it here.

Fiona's post has made me curious about something. I knew Giles wouldn't be touching anything before he didn't touch anything - or soon after he started not touching anything.

For those of you who didn't spoil at all, did you notice it yourselves, or did you notice people talking about it here first, and then notice it?

A reasonable way to look at it. Because it fits my theory that Buffy "didn't choose" Dawn when she asked Xander to drive Dawn far away from Sunnydale.

Yep. See when I take away my knowledge of Jane's totally wrong answer (Jane, I'd still give you a kidney, well, maybe not a kidney, but some money or something), that's how it fits in for me, too.


tina f. - Jul 09, 2003 9:24:57 am PDT #3254 of 10001

I didn't notice Giles not touching until I saw you guys talking about it. This may have a lot more to do with giving up on trying to speculate about Giles' story after Grave than anything else. It's a long story. I thought he had been in Hell (where Angel was) and we were going to find out about in some flashback for like three seasons because I am a moron.

I did not think Joyce was the First. It makes abso-fucking-lutely no sense that she was. I can't read Buffy sending Dawn away as "not choosing" her - now I will look back and just think. "Hmmm. Joyce/The First just said something to freak Dawn out - that's all it was."

These things aren't what makes the bulk of S7 kinda crappy for me - for me - it's the lack of good stand-alones, too many extra people I don't care about, not even caring about some of my core four (Willow) and the speeches.

However, the finale made up for a lot of it. It is pretty much exactly what I wanted. Especially when it comes to Slayer-empowerment. Plus, if you would have told me that they could have "ended" A/B and S/B exactly the way I wanted them - I would have said "Impossible! Stop smoking all that crack!" And yet, they did.


Wolfram - Jul 09, 2003 9:25:03 am PDT #3255 of 10001
Visilurking

For those of you who didn't spoil at all, did you notice it yourselves, or did you notice people talking about it here first, and then notice it?

The latter. And had it never been pointed out to me, I probably would have found the scoobie realization scene much funnier. It's like the punchline was spoiled because the setup was revealed.


§ ita § - Jul 09, 2003 9:26:26 am PDT #3256 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I wondered if everyone was the FE, so for every appearance, it was a countdown to physical contact.


Cindy - Jul 09, 2003 9:35:59 am PDT #3257 of 10001
Nobody

I wondered if everyone was the FE, so for every appearance, it was a countdown to physical contact.

I kept waiting for FE!Buffy to fool someone other than Spike. That could have had some value to it, particularly before they realized they were dealing with the FE.

tina - I agree the payoff wasn't great for the Joyce thing, even if you decide Joyce was Joyce and not the FE as Joyce. It's just the only thing there, well that, and Dawn turning out not to be a potential, but although Buffy wouldn't have wanted Dawn to be a slayer, Buffy had no say in who was a slayer.

I still think though, in the Buffyverse, when someone invokes the power of everyone who loves her and all the strength within, she does a spell powerful enough, that that should have been ghost!Joyce, not FE!Joyce, so I have to reject Jane's answer. It doesn't matter to me that she wrote the damned thing. Canon is all.

edited to try and make some sense.


Vortex - Jul 09, 2003 9:38:09 am PDT #3258 of 10001
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

For those of you who didn't spoil at all, did you notice it yourselves, or did you notice people talking about it here first, and then notice it?

People talked about it here, but the clues were rampant once I started thinking about it.

I don't know about you all, but I am still highly unsatisfied by Giles' behaviour. Even after he was not the First, I didn't like how he behaved (i.e. slashing the Bringer's throat)


sj - Jul 09, 2003 9:39:54 am PDT #3259 of 10001
"There are few hours in life more agreeable than the hour dedicated to the ceremony known as afternoon tea."

I don't know about you all, but I am still highly unsatisfied by Giles' behaviour. Even after he was not the First, I didn't like how he behaved (i.e. slashing the Bringer's throat)

I'm right there with you.


Cindy - Jul 09, 2003 9:41:48 am PDT #3260 of 10001
Nobody

I didn't mind the throat slash. I think ASH was misused, but really, I'm not so sure they were always certain which episodes they'd have him in, and that may have been due to ASH's schedule, so I never had great expectations. I was just glad to see him when I could. I did think the misdirect with the Bringer almost killing him was lame though.