I have no problem with him asking that question in that way. I agree that someone who we've banned joining the discussion (or, like Zoe, using a different folder as a personal playground) is a different thing.
That's disturbing. You're emotionally scarred and will end up badly.
Anya ,'Bring On The Night'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Lyra Jane - Apr 16, 2003 9:45:55 am PDT #426 of 10005
Up with the sun
P.M. Marc - Apr 16, 2003 9:46:07 am PDT #427 of 10005
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Laura, ignoring her just made it worse, in this case.
Because when we were at PF, she was ignored, thanks to the blessed ENUF filter, and she just posted more and more and more. It made her worse when she came back here, too.
Attention, no attention--it didn't matter what we did. She just went into full-on SpamTroll mode.
Cindy - Apr 16, 2003 9:50:37 am PDT #428 of 10005
Nobody
Consuela - Apr 16, 2003 9:52:21 am PDT #429 of 10005
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
And how glad am I that I don't post under my real name?
So. Very. Glad.
And, of course, she spelled my username wrong. Again. On purpose, the bitch.
I know we're not supposed to, but I'm allowing myself to speculate on her mental capacity. I promise not to do so publicly.
Elena - Apr 16, 2003 9:52:57 am PDT #430 of 10005
Thanks for all the fish.
Wait a sec, she hasn't been banned?
I think that's the first order of business, since her behaviour is clearly in violation of - hmm, CS, common sense, politeness, reasonability.
(edit) Are our profiles (and e-mail addresses) only viewable by registered members?
PaulJ - Apr 16, 2003 9:55:47 am PDT #431 of 10005
Oficially, she has been suspended for two months, right? Which means that, on June 15th, if the consensus of the community is that she has shown signs of being able to coexist with others, she will be here again...
DXMachina - Apr 16, 2003 9:58:48 am PDT #432 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
When she made the threats, she violated etiquette again, so the ban is automatic. I don't even think we have to discuss it at this point. She's done for good here and on WX already. ita e-mailed Lance to figure out what to do about PF.
Cindy - Apr 16, 2003 10:01:06 am PDT #433 of 10005
Nobody
DXMachina - Apr 16, 2003 10:03:31 am PDT #434 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
I know DX agreed that she probably should be.
I should've been clearer. Violating etiquette while under suspension is an automatic ban.
Wolfram - Apr 16, 2003 10:04:40 am PDT #435 of 10005
Visilurking
Isn't a ban just an indefinite suspension? What I mean is, isn't it just a matter of never unlocking her account, or is there another procedure? FWIW, you can put me in the ban her indefinitely corner, because it's become clear to me that she's a troll.