Mal: You tell me right now, little Kaylee, you really think you can do this? Kaylee: Sure. Yeah. I think so. 'Sides, if I mess up, not like you'll be able to yell at me.
'Bushwhacked'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Cindy - Apr 16, 2003 9:50:37 am PDT #428 of 10005
Nobody
Consuela - Apr 16, 2003 9:52:21 am PDT #429 of 10005
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
And how glad am I that I don't post under my real name?
So. Very. Glad.
And, of course, she spelled my username wrong. Again. On purpose, the bitch.
I know we're not supposed to, but I'm allowing myself to speculate on her mental capacity. I promise not to do so publicly.
Elena - Apr 16, 2003 9:52:57 am PDT #430 of 10005
Thanks for all the fish.
Wait a sec, she hasn't been banned?
I think that's the first order of business, since her behaviour is clearly in violation of - hmm, CS, common sense, politeness, reasonability.
(edit) Are our profiles (and e-mail addresses) only viewable by registered members?
PaulJ - Apr 16, 2003 9:55:47 am PDT #431 of 10005
Oficially, she has been suspended for two months, right? Which means that, on June 15th, if the consensus of the community is that she has shown signs of being able to coexist with others, she will be here again...
DXMachina - Apr 16, 2003 9:58:48 am PDT #432 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
When she made the threats, she violated etiquette again, so the ban is automatic. I don't even think we have to discuss it at this point. She's done for good here and on WX already. ita e-mailed Lance to figure out what to do about PF.
Cindy - Apr 16, 2003 10:01:06 am PDT #433 of 10005
Nobody
DXMachina - Apr 16, 2003 10:03:31 am PDT #434 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
I know DX agreed that she probably should be.
I should've been clearer. Violating etiquette while under suspension is an automatic ban.
Wolfram - Apr 16, 2003 10:04:40 am PDT #435 of 10005
Visilurking
Isn't a ban just an indefinite suspension? What I mean is, isn't it just a matter of never unlocking her account, or is there another procedure? FWIW, you can put me in the ban her indefinitely corner, because it's become clear to me that she's a troll.
DXMachina - Apr 16, 2003 10:06:02 am PDT #436 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Isn't a ban just an indefinite suspension? What I mean is, isn't it just a matter of never unlocking her account
Correct.
amych - Apr 16, 2003 10:07:27 am PDT #437 of 10005
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Technically, it's a matter of never unlocking the account -- we don't delete the account, because then the name would be free for her or someone else to register with it again. Policy-wise, it's a matter of never unlocking and never going to, either.