One of the things that's so cool about Tim coming here and posting is that he really is one of us when he's here - we don't have a VIP archive, his posts aren't singled out and in fourteen point bold. I think an all-Tim, all-the-time thread is moving away from this. A general alum thread, which I suspect would be named in some way for Tim anyway, would be a better fit. And when Wonder Falls actually comes on the air, we'll have a better idea if it needs a thread separate from that.
Brenda said it better than I did.
If we had a Works of Tim thread, would we be disallowed from discussing episodes Tim has written in the Angel thread?
I feel like that's an unfair question that gets trotted out, anytime anyone is opposing any thread. With the exception of forbidding spoilers outside of their natural habitat, (and nattering in Beep Me and Press) when do we ever regulate conversation?
We did have an Angel thread named, "No Unca Tim! Noooooooo!!!"
I think this is sort of in the same spirit. He was the driving force behind Angel, and so I think the thread was very Minearesque.
How far in advance did the Firefly thread start? There was like, two-thousand posts before the show even aired.
Very early, but that was on WX before we had the thread proliferation issues.
I mean, sure, wait until closer to the show airs, but I dont think lack of conversation is ever a problem, here.
Allyson, some questions: Are you going to attach an opening date to your proposal or (assuming it passes) are you going to open it right away. Also, repeated questions from upstream, will this be a NAFDA thread, and how will we treat spoilers?
I have no idea how to explain why I think it's confusing to have a general alum thread. It's just what my brain is screaming at me this foggy morning.
Here's my take. I want a works-o-Minear thread. I think his work and his presence here merit it. Unless something's shifted, I see no reason that one would be banned from talking about his Angel eps in Angel -- I'm still allowed to talk Movies in Natter, right?
Part of it is because I think he's damned good, and his stuff generates a lot potential for discussion. And the other part is because he's Tim, and he's cool, and he comes around and participates.
This
does
distinguish him from the other alum, in my eyes. Especially those not showrunning next year.
However, volumewise, I'm prone to suggest delaying the opening to mitigate the potential natter and keep volume down. Until we're closer to Wonderfalls info, which is the big driver for this for me.
Yes, Cindy, I made the proposal very simple so that it wouldnt be too nitty to reshape it as discussion goes on. I hope. Please. For the love of Minear. ahhhh ha ha
Also, repeated questions from upstream, will this be a NAFDA thread, and how will we treat spoilers?
Just a note, I think ANY show related thread shere are inherently NAFDA.
Yes, Cindy, I made the proposal very simple so that it wouldnt be too nitty to reshape it as discussion goes on. I hope. Please. For the love of Minear. ahhhh ha ha
I appreciate that. And trawling for chocolate aside, I'm in favor of a Tim-works thread. I was just trying to steer the discussion back to the thread you've actually proposed. It seems to me that the requests for an alum thread don't fit in this discussion, as that not what you proposed, and it's not what people seconded.
Just a note, I think ANY show related thread shere are inherently NAFDA.
That's how I feel too, but you never can tell with Bees.
that was on WX before we had the thread proliferation issues.
Just to clarify, it was before we had technical thread-proliferation issues. But there have always been philosophical proliferation issues for a lot of people -- including me, even though I'm in favor of this one.
