I assume she's never, EVER, met a straight man who likes being on the bottom for anal sex.
I'm sure she doesn't count straight men and anal sex as vanilla, especially if he's on the receiving end.
eta: I read more of her tumblr, and she seems to be a smug lesbian submissive who's a professional top, so I figure she figure she's untouchable when she talks about sex.
The question is how do you define vanilla? Is this some 1950s idea of under-the-covers, nightgown-pulled-up, lights-off missionary (and of course heterosexual) sex only? Where does the line get drawn?
...I couldn't get past Peacock Angel. Really?
I'm sure she doesn't count straight men and anal sex as vanilla, especially if he's on the receiving end.
The question is how do you define vanilla? Is this some 1950s idea of under-the-covers, nightgown-pulled-up, lights-off missionary (and of course heterosexual) sex only? Where does the line get drawn?
I think she must be defining it *very* narrowly.
I think she must be defining it *very* narrowly.
I'm sure it's sex where nothing cool happens.
I don't think of
anything
anal being particularly "vanilla".
I'm sure it's sex where nothing cool happens.
Lie back and think of quadratic equations.
Unless you dig quadratic equations. In which case, keep your kinky freaky math to yourself.
I don't think of anything anal being particularly "vanilla".
I think "vanilla" is increasingly hard to define. Because I was assuming she meant "vanilla" as "not incorporating one of the components of BDSM," where "BDSM" = (1) bondage/discipline; (2) dominance/submission; (3) sadism/masochism; and (4) fetishy stuff that doesn't quite fall under any of those umbrellas, like dudes into feet, or human ponies, etc.
Since I was reading "vanilla" in that light, I think it's entirely possible for a man to take it up the Khyber Pass without it ever falling under any of those categories.
I understand that a man receiving anal sex isn't *common* (AFAIK), but I'm not really willing to define "vanilla" as "common."
In my head, vanilla means "plain old regular sex," but what that means for me and what it means to anyone else could be completely different things.
I'm not really willing to define "vanilla" as "common."
Also this. Especially since human beings are involved. Very individual human beings, in all sorts of pairs and groups.
This is very cool. [link] Lots of sound.