yeah, I did one of mac at obamaicon or something. I am debating changing it a bit and getting a shirt or something.
Hauser: You really think you can solve the problem? Come into Wolfram & Hart and make everything right? Turn night into glorious day? You pathetic little fairy. Angel: I'm not little.
'Just Rewards (2)'
Natter 63: Life after PuppyCam
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
msbelle - Jan 22, 2009 9:01:59 am PST #3068 of 30000
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Emily - Jan 22, 2009 9:07:28 am PST #3069 of 30000
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
And I got here too late to help with the math. Darn.
Yeah, me too. I worked it out before checking. I think the key (because the amount of numbers involved can be overwhelming) is to break it down to one problem at a time. First, how much does the car cost per day? Then work out how much each person owes per day, which is easier at that point.
Of course, nobody cares anymore. But I think a lot about how to explain these things.
Sue - Jan 22, 2009 9:08:36 am PST #3070 of 30000
hip deep in pie
Okay, this Obamaicon killed me: [link]
lisah - Jan 22, 2009 9:09:11 am PST #3071 of 30000
Punishingly Intricate
lisah - Jan 22, 2009 9:10:46 am PST #3072 of 30000
Punishingly Intricate
But I think a lot about how to explain these things.
Thank you! I wish I'd had you for 4th grade math!
tommyrot - Jan 22, 2009 9:11:31 am PST #3073 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
What I really want to see from Obama is some sort of investigation/prosecution of Bush et al for violations of US and international law in the torture of detainees. I know Obama wants to "look forward" but maybe he can appoint Patrick Fitzgerald to head an investigation? If prosecutions are warranted, I'm sure Obama could do a good job explaining to the people why they're necessary.
Emily - Jan 22, 2009 9:16:36 am PST #3074 of 30000
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
Thank you! I wish I'd had you for 4th grade math!
Well, I'm not saying I actually SUCCEED in explaining things well. Just that I think about it!
Do you think Obama could just reopen the WPA? That would be cool.
Glamcookie - Jan 22, 2009 9:21:17 am PST #3075 of 30000
I know my own heart and understand my fellow man. But I am made unlike anyone I have ever met. I dare to say I am like no one in the whole world. - Anne Lister
Obama to Bush: I Can Release Your Records. Don't Like It? Sue.
SQUEE!!! Does this mean they might prosecute for illegal Bush activities? Cause I thought I heard that Obama has been making noises about not doing that ("moving forward, not looking back") and to that I say FUCK NO! PROSECUTE! It's important as it sets a precedent for future administrations.
Fred Pete - Jan 22, 2009 9:23:01 am PST #3076 of 30000
Ann, that's a ferret.
tommy, I'm with you almost 100%. Because "looking forward" doesn't just mean "stop it," it means "never again." That means we have to investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute.
The only part where I differ is that by saying, "Bush et al," you're suggesting that the investigation expressly include certain particular individuals. The investigation can't be seen to prejudge anyone. The point is to fix it, not to get back at anyone.
tommyrot - Jan 22, 2009 9:28:00 am PST #3077 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
to that I say FUCK NO! PROSECUTE! It's important as it sets a precedent for future administrations.
Not only that, but it sends an important message to our friends and enemies that we're a nation of laws to which even our leaders are accountable.