This is from a ways back, but I was thinking the "5 beings in creation" were Lucifer and the archangels, unless Lucifer counts as one of the archangels. Lucifer and the four horsemen also makes sense. I think that "in creation" phrasing excludes God.
Mal ,'Jaynestown'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
It's entirely possible that Lucifer and Michael (and their brothers Raphael and Gabriel) aren't subject to death under any circumstances, and that the most any of them could do to one another is banishment.
Wikipedia lists a varying number of archangels, but I don't see a Christian list of 4 that doesn't include Uriel, who is dead. The Islamic list is Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, and Azrael.
Our Uriel wasn't an archangel, was he? Just a garden-variety angel.
I meant Michael and Gabriel and I don't know who else but presumably the four angels that have been face to face with God, or whatever it was Anna said when she was making the absentee-creator point. I don't know if Lucifer would be one of those or not.
Our Uriel wasn't an archangel, was he? Just a garden-variety angel.
He SHOULD have been an archangel, which is why I kept getting so confused. (I know, Plei. I need to get back to handwaving the mythology/occult stuff. My head hurts less when I do.)
We've pretty much had confirmation that Lucifer has had direct one-to-one communication with God, hence his Fall. It's not clear whether Anna would have been counting him as an angel for the purpose of her count of four, though. If not we're still missing an archangel.
As soon as I heard Castiel say something along the lines of "the Bible gets more wrong than it gets right," I took it as the writers signalling us that they had given themselves carte blanche to muck around with accepted theology/apocrypha/tradition/etc. if it served the plot.
It's not clear whether Anna would have been counting him as an angel for the purpose of her count of four, though.
Yeah, that's my reasoning.
As soon as I heard Castiel say something along the lines of "the Bible gets more wrong than it gets right," I took it as the writers signalling us that they had given themselves carte blanche to muck around with accepted theology/apocrypha/tradition/etc. if it served the plot.
Good catch! I didn't remember that.
Killing them both is the only way to keep 'em dead.
I laughed out loud when I read this because of course that is the first thing the Winchester boys try is resurrecting each other. Then I looked at the sentence. Wow, I am in love with such a dark show.
Incidentally, I've got my pennies on 5x17 for Bobby Bites It. Anyone else?
Is 17 the next one? I never remember which number we are on. I do think that Bobby is going to die with enough episodes to miss him before the finale. I'm pretty much expecting everyone to drop to the side with the last to die being Sam and Dean.
Next season they'd go back to random mythological creatures? I can't see how that wouldn't be a letdown.
This is me and that is the first time I have EVER felt that way about a show. Always, always, always I would have argued a case for another season. But...what do you do after fighting Lucifer? No, this should be the end, the Winchesters should save the world but most likely die doing so.
But, you know, I'll watch which ever way they decide to go.
But...what do you do after fighting Lucifer? No, this should be the end, the Winchesters should save the world but most likely die doing so.
WINCHESTERS IN SPAAAAACE!
There have to be other worlds to save, right?