That explains my Twitter feed. I really wish people would indicate what they're reacting to, not just post their reactions.

I need to make sure I don't go near the Tumblrs of the people who were asking for her head for running Misha out of town. Too much of a risk they'll be gloating now.

I'm sad to see her go. I like her energy, and I like her episodes.

But, yeah, if she's being replaced, not just stepping down--that's really positive for a new season.

I agree -- I can't imagine why they would have hired a new showrunner, and let it leak, if they weren't fairly certain the series would be renewed.

Sera didn't drive Misha away! Reality, folks! Look into it.

Fans? Reality? Methinks you ask too much.

I'm sad to see them down a woman of great influence in the writers room. I hope it's not too much to ask that they acquire some more down the road.

Someone just called 'Mystery Spot' one of the funny episodes. I need to learn how to let that go. They played bits of it as slapstick, and people laughed. But I just found it so overwhelmingly tragic that I get defensive for the boys.

It doesn't help that she's slamming Ben Edlund as being ridiculous at the same time, I suppose.

When I hear "Mystery Spot," I always think of the funny first, just for the visuals. Also, I think, because I was astonished when the episode turned halfway through into the giant angstfest with scary obsessed!Sam.

I seriously never found it funny, although I get that Dean died in shockingly slapsticky ways. I just kept feeling bad for Sam. I was kind of surprised to find out people had been laughing.

Guy who posted the news about Sera on IO9 called her a mook. I don't really know what a mook is, but he's taken it back, and replaced it by saying he hasn't liked the last two seasons, which is totally reasonable.

Hm, I'm ambivalent about the news. I think it's good for SPN, but potentially bad for Being Human.

Well, he has some sort of role in producing Being Human (and his wife is the new showrunner.)

I'm rather jazzed that Jeremy Carver is coming back as co-showrunner. I like Sera and I'll miss her stories, but Jeremy is pretty awesome and I missed his when he went to produce Being Human.

So I was surfing tumblr (as is my wont) and I saw this reblogged:

What aggravates me is when canons deliberately queer-bait, flirting with homoerotic tension and then laughing about it and going, “No homo!”; when they ruthlessly exploit the popularity factor of slashiness without ever allowing their central ~BROTP~ to really, actually, just for once, be textually gay - and when fandom lauds that as progressive and queer-friendly.

and the person whose blog I was on had tagged it, amongst other things "#I'm looking at you Supernatural! ".

Do you think that's fair? Do you think Show yells "Psych!" and takes a step back from having done something with gay overtones? I don't think that's fair. I think fandom spends a lot of time reading gay overtones into the text, and that when show *does* put the overtones in, they don't yell "no homo!" and undo it, they just change topic. They don't step back, they just turn right or left.

I'm a raging m/m slash fan in other fandoms, and I get its appeal. My slash bell doesn't peal for SPN, so I have no horse in the Destiel/Wincest race. I don't read homoeroticism in Show, but if others do, I'm a live-and-let-live kind of gal.

Show has "winked" and "nudged" at slash fandom with the occasional gay comment, but I don't read that as deliberate baiting and walking it back. I think it's a friendly nod to slash fans, but a few tinfoil hat fans aren't in the mood to be toyed with. So, no, I don't think it a fair assessment. I think someone's bitter that Show won't take things where she wants it to go.