Tara ,'Storyteller'
A topic for the discussion of Doctor Who, Arrow, and The Flash. Beware possible invasions of iZombie, Sleepy Hollow, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi, superhero, or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect adult content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Marvel superheroes are discussed over at the MCU thread.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
I don't think it was quite that bad, everything that happened still actually happened.
Did it? Because what happened to the scene at the diner post-death? Did it ever happen? Did he just pop out of the Fake! Doctor! and pop back to the diner?
Stephen Moffatt makes my head hurt, dammit.
Because what happened to the scene at the diner post-death? Did it ever happen? Did he just pop out of the Fake! Doctor! and pop back to the diner?
The Doctor in the diner wasn't the Doctor in the Doctor that got shot, though. I don't see why it wouldn't have happened. The part where they burnt the body still happened.
The Doctor in the diner wasn't the Doctor in the Doctor that got shot, though. I don't see why it wouldn't have happened. The part where they burnt the body still happened.
This, and also it would pretty much have to have happened for everything after it to have happened.
I would like, at some point, for the stakes not to be THE END OF ALL TIME. Just for variety.
I've ranted about this before, so let's see if I can do a short version instead of a TLDR: Writers, the stakes don't have to be the universe, the world, or even everything important to the entire series to generate suspense. An old Jewish saying is: "To kill one person is to destroy the world." (paraphrased). Even if last episode, the lives of millions were endangered, that does not mean that the life or happiness or one person can't be just as strong a basis for suspense in this episode.
Yes, well, now we get to see what the Doctor's version of laying low is. Maybe.
I must say, I'm curious what Nine or Ten would have made of Rory. I'm not sure Nine would have had a lot affection for him, but I bet he and Ten would have seriously bonded. More than him and Eleven, quite honestly.
Yeah, I think Ten would have really appreciated Rory's steadfastness, even more than Eleven does. I think Eleven takes it for granted.
Moffat's a great big cheater. But I'll let him have this one.
Yes, BUT.... Wasn't the Doctor's death required to put time right again? But he didn't really die! So how does the pseudo-Death of a robot controlled by miniaturised people which happened to look like the Doctor put things right again?
Also, why was it necessary for the Doctor to actually marry River. Apart from giving her a reason to touch him again, or was that it? (I was pretty tired last night, perhaps I should just rewatch).
Other than that, I actually enjoyed the episode quite a lot. Especially Charles Dickens being asked about the Christmas Special.
Not quite sure how I feel about this episode. It feels like a cop out, and does this also mean that no fixed point is really fixed?
I sometimes miss the simpler Doctor Who days.
But... new tag! I adore Amy and Rory in any timeline!
Perhaps they're only "fixed" points. It's hard to pronounce quote marks, especially in the heat of battle and/or weddings.