Connie?
Shh! I kinda wanna hear me talking right now!
Glory ,'The Killer In Me'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
Laura - Aug 10, 2007 5:02:51 pm PDT #855 of 6786
Our wings are not tired.
P.M. Marc - Aug 10, 2007 6:14:58 pm PDT #856 of 6786
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Personally, I think there's been quite enough discussion and we should go straight to the vote, but what do others think?
That right now, without having seen the data resulting from the poll, I'd be most likely, as Hec is, to vote no, and that it doesn't seem fair to the proposal to rush ahead with it at this time.
sumi - Aug 10, 2007 6:17:15 pm PDT #857 of 6786
Art Crawl!!!
I thought that we put a halt to discussion -- and we were going to have more discussion after the wait. I didn't realize we were just waiting to vote.
bon bon - Aug 10, 2007 6:21:16 pm PDT #858 of 6786
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
If we go straight to a vote right before the weekend I foresee a lot of post hoc protest. So I would suggest another four days for discussion, until Tuesday, basically because I don't actually foresee a lot of discussion given how much we've discussed thread creation of late.
Lee - Aug 10, 2007 7:03:02 pm PDT #859 of 6786
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
I think bon bon is wise, and also I agree with her on waiting to vote.
JenP - Aug 11, 2007 3:21:00 am PDT #860 of 6786
That right now, without having seen the data resulting from the poll, I'd be most likely, as Hec is, to vote no, and that it doesn't seem fair to the proposal to rush ahead with it at this time.
My thought, too.
Connie Neil - Aug 11, 2007 7:12:47 am PDT #861 of 6786
brillig
I would like to reopen Lightbulbs to continue the discussion. Does anyone remember how much time was left before voting, or should we reset the clock?
Jesse - Aug 11, 2007 7:23:03 am PDT #862 of 6786
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Discussion actually happened for just over four days the first time, but I still think we should give it another four before voting.
Kat - Aug 11, 2007 11:48:45 am PDT #863 of 6786
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
I disagree about giving it more time than the alloted 4 days it has already received, in part because we've discussed to death.
Connie, if there is more discussion, do you anticipate that it will change the ballot in any way?
Connie Neil - Aug 11, 2007 12:33:52 pm PDT #864 of 6786
brillig
Connie, if there is more discussion, do you anticipate that it will change the ballot in any way?
Not really, it's a straightforward proposal: Network Drama thread, yes or no.
They're asking for a delay in voting so they can mull the expected poll data. I don't think anyone's minds are going to be changed by the data, but I'll consider the idea if a firm deadline is accepted. Me, I'm willing to go with the vote now and let the chips fall. But I'm told being amenable to compromise is gracious.