That right now, without having seen the data resulting from the poll, I'd be most likely, as Hec is, to vote no, and that it doesn't seem fair to the proposal to rush ahead with it at this time.
My thought, too.
Darn your sinister attraction!
Buffybot ,'Dirty Girls'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
JenP - Aug 11, 2007 3:21:00 am PDT #860 of 6786
Connie Neil - Aug 11, 2007 7:12:47 am PDT #861 of 6786
brillig
I would like to reopen Lightbulbs to continue the discussion. Does anyone remember how much time was left before voting, or should we reset the clock?
Jesse - Aug 11, 2007 7:23:03 am PDT #862 of 6786
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Discussion actually happened for just over four days the first time, but I still think we should give it another four before voting.
Kat - Aug 11, 2007 11:48:45 am PDT #863 of 6786
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
I disagree about giving it more time than the alloted 4 days it has already received, in part because we've discussed to death.
Connie, if there is more discussion, do you anticipate that it will change the ballot in any way?
Connie Neil - Aug 11, 2007 12:33:52 pm PDT #864 of 6786
brillig
Connie, if there is more discussion, do you anticipate that it will change the ballot in any way?
Not really, it's a straightforward proposal: Network Drama thread, yes or no.
They're asking for a delay in voting so they can mull the expected poll data. I don't think anyone's minds are going to be changed by the data, but I'll consider the idea if a firm deadline is accepted. Me, I'm willing to go with the vote now and let the chips fall. But I'm told being amenable to compromise is gracious.
Kevin - Aug 12, 2007 3:24:52 am PDT #865 of 6786
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.
I'm sorry, but if it goes up for discussion again, it will just go nowhere. IMHO. Based on watching the same thing happening over and over.
I want to propose a Comedy thread also. (But not yet, obviously).
§ ita § - Aug 12, 2007 7:21:16 am PDT #866 of 6786
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
What do you mean by nowhere? It will go to a vote if connie wants it. That's the only place it has to go.
You don't have to get value out of the discussion. It's primarily for connie and her proposition.
Fred Pete - Aug 12, 2007 5:00:42 pm PDT #867 of 6786
Ann, that's a ferret.
The proposal has had the four days of discussion. Under our rules, it's time for a vote. And there may be other proposals that are also being delayed.
But I'll defer to Connie. If she's willing to wait longer, I won't quarrel.
Laga - Aug 12, 2007 5:21:17 pm PDT #868 of 6786
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
I can see the point of waiting until Monday. This board is pretty dead on the weekends.
Topic!Cindy - Aug 13, 2007 8:10:25 am PDT #869 of 6786
What is even happening?
msbelle, Sean, Hec, and askye,
Could we please see the poll results to date? I'd like to see them, before I vote on Connie's proposal, but I don't want to ask Connie to wait again.