A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I agree with Jim (hi, Jim! don't I get e-mail? I can disagree with you if you like...) and with PaulJ and askye.
A) it's not a big deal and B) it's being made into a big deal because people are hesitant to use the moderation system currently in effect. Therefore, it all gets talked out endlessly HERE, and turned in to far too big a deal.
How long is long enough to wait when you know that the unofficial notice/intervention has done as much good as pissing into the wind?
I would say a week.
Who's working on the boilerplate warning test? My proposal was just a quick draft -- I know there are people way better at that than I am.
Michele, I'm confused on what points do you agree with Jim and what points do you agree with me?
Jim thinks we should just ignore her but let her stay.
I think we should issue a formal warning and if she continues her behaviour then supsend her.
Also I'm confused by the concept of "she can't seem to follow the rules but we should let her stay anyway."
Me three, but I don't think a week is too long to wait. (I kind of wish there weren't two new eps this week because of it, but, eh, timing.)
Misha - You have no email address! Plus I doubt you need me to point out the obvious.
Also I'm confused by the concept of "she can't seem to follow the rules but we should let her stay anyway."
I think there's some disagreement as to whether "she's mostly incoherent" counts as following the rules or not. Some people clearly think that's a suspendable/bannable offense, while others don't.
How about the fact that she's serial posting like it's going out of style in several different threads?
I agree the incoherence/serial posting is irritating, but I'm not sure we can warn or ban someone just for being annoying, as it doesn't break any specific rules.
I'm not arguing either way, just pointing out that there's a difference of opinion on the question that might not be completely evident.