I don't think there's any trolling, here - it's about a lack of comprehension of certain norms of behaviour.
But why should we have to put up with the repeated and persistent failure to conform to board etiquette?
'Not Fade Away'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I don't think there's any trolling, here - it's about a lack of comprehension of certain norms of behaviour.
But why should we have to put up with the repeated and persistent failure to conform to board etiquette?
Can't I just have the porn?
Wolfram always means monkey, Dana. Don't take his porn (or cookies).
You can keep the monkey porn to yourself, I'll take the cookies.
Dana - Micole - you have mail.
Jim, I have to agree with Micole.
I'd rather someone porned with my monkeys, than monkeyed with my porn. IJS.
I don't think she's malicious as much as she's utterly clueless, but I swear to god, the inanities are driving me to drink. And the sheer frequency of her posts make it very difficult to ignore her, especially if you follow the Angel thread.
I think a warning is reasonable given some of her recent behavior at UnAmerican. The thing is, she might (and it's a big might) cut down her defensive lashing-out after the warning, but I just can't see her changing her style of posts to make them more comprehensible. And incoherence on its own would not merit a further official action.
Which makes me think that filter is really the way to go.
Exactly. Until the Filter is onstream, just ignore the problem.
I filter with ease so not a big deal for me. Pass the porn please. Hold the monkeys.