The wording on that looks perfect to me. Anybody see emendations that are needed?
"A positive decision is assumed to have been made if it was put into effect; a negative decision is assumed to have been made if an idea was discussed and dropped."
Joyce ,'Never Leave Me'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
The wording on that looks perfect to me. Anybody see emendations that are needed?
"A positive decision is assumed to have been made if it was put into effect; a negative decision is assumed to have been made if an idea was discussed and dropped."
Oh - was Anne W. working up a list of specific decisions? Do we want or need to wait for her to finish, or should we just go ahead with the blanket statement?
The wording on that looks perfect to me. Anybody see emendations that are needed?
It looks good, but I think any emendation suggestions should wait until it's in discussion right?
Someone, I forget who (Anne maybe?), was going to make a list of all the decisions we've made. That list should definitely be appended. t edit x-post w/ Brenda.
Also, do we want to say "shall begin from the passage of this proposal" or "shall begin from the time the decision was made or idea was dropped"? With the former, assuming the current ballot passes, there will be things that we won't be reconsidering until 9 months after the initial decision. Which may be fine -- I don't have a strong opinion either way.
Oh - was Anne W. working up a list of specific decisions? Do we want or need to wait for her to finish, or should we just go ahead with the blanket statement?
I cannot express enough how helpful this list would be for this issue.
She's working on it.
I believe the idea was that to avoid massive pain in the discussion, the proposer would put forward a final ballot; the discussion would be about "yes" or "no", not about tweaking the ballot. Otherwise you run into consensus issues again.
Or did I misunderstand?
edit: see here: Cindy "Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier" Mar 27, 2003 2:11:26 pm EST
Betsy, as I understand it, you make the initial proposal but after discussion you have the freedom to amend at will until the end when you post a final ballot.
I believe the idea was that to avoid massive pain in the discussion, the proposer would put forward a final ballot; the discussion would be about "yes" or "no", not about tweaking the ballot.
That's certainly what I understood.
and I thought you could suggest things you'd like to see on the ballot, and why, but the final decision lay with the proposer.