You're not gonna jokey-rhyme your way out of this one.

Willow ,'Sleeper'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


evil jimi - Sep 20, 2002 4:36:28 pm PDT #115 of 10001
Lurching from one disaster to the next.

*lights match between toes of jengod's stompy foot. walks off, whistling innocently*

I do think a decision needs to be made whether the Phoenix is solely a Joss World Domination project, or whether it will be extended beyond that. It doesn't seem fair to include one show and not another, i.e., Smallville but not Farscape, so some kind of consistency needs to be achieved. Personally, I'm not fussed either way, yet it would be nice to discuss other genre shows.


P.M. Marc - Sep 20, 2002 4:38:53 pm PDT #116 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

The Farscapers still have the Who's Your Daddy thread at WX. Smallville grew out of a desire to not clutter SB w/ Lex... all the time.

Or is Smallville the lone non-Joss show representative?

We also have Due South.


§ ita § - Sep 20, 2002 4:39:52 pm PDT #117 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I think it was a volume thing, evil jimi. The Smallville traffic is not only pretty horrendous, its volume drowns out things near it.

While there's probably more respect for Farscape among Buffistas, I don't know if there's the sort of critical mass of discussion that could support what grew to three threads on the Smallville case.

edit: Right -- Due South. It's all about the Ho Yay!


Michele T. - Sep 20, 2002 4:42:14 pm PDT #118 of 10001
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

Politics is also a very different beast than, say, a new show, or even a general movies thread. I'm much more likely to change my opinion of a person based on whether he approves of John Ashcroft's stomping on the Bill of Rights than on whether she thinks Kristen Kreuk can act. Many more opportunities for flame-age, for troll-attract-age, for bad feeling-age. I'm with the nay-age.

ETA -- I came in very late to this discussion, didn't I? Sorry if I'm restating the obvious.


DavidS - Sep 20, 2002 5:01:54 pm PDT #119 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

A thought occurs to me now as I contemplate the demise of The 11th Hour.

Another possible thrust for the Buffistas would be to reverse the usual dynamic: content board, with discussion boards attached. So we start as a discussion board, then create content (that is, longer articles etc.).

I'm just kicking it around. I've enjoyed things like The 11th Hour and especially their quirky survey articles, and Omar's Smallville Recaps on TWOP. We've discussed creating a backlog of Anyas as a kind of Snarky Cliff Notes Guide to Buffy and Angel. It might be nice to create a space for us to write about genre shows within Phoenix. Of course, we could always just throw up some links, but I'm thinking of something that would exist within the community.


Burrell - Sep 20, 2002 5:32:48 pm PDT #120 of 10001
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!

Actually, there is already a lot of good content being generated by Buffistae, so I could definitely see us eventually putting out a little something. And despite the glaring evidence to the contrary, I really didn't mean that to sound quite so porny.


Typo Boy - Sep 20, 2002 5:41:09 pm PDT #121 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Maybe this could combine with the politics thing. We cou ld have a Buffista on-line zine to which critiques of shows, movies, books, politics, social issue whatever could be submitted . Only Buffistas could submit (participants only or lurkers as well?). Someone would act as editor, accpeting, rejecting or sending back for rewrite.

Hell, ita has always been the Buffista to whom I would most like to submit.


DavidS - Sep 20, 2002 6:19:13 pm PDT #122 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Hell, ita has always been the Buffista to whom I would most like to submit.

Ple's got my vote.


Steph L. - Sep 20, 2002 7:05:13 pm PDT #123 of 10001
the hardest to learn / was the least complicated

Another possible thrust for the Buffistas would be to reverse the usual dynamic: content board, with discussion boards attached. So we start as a discussion board, then create content (that is, longer articles etc.).

Consuela and Dana have already written pieces of this nature, on genre TV, that are on a site similar to 11th Hour. We *certainly* have the resources here to create such writing. We also have editors here, and people who can make it all look pretty.

We're well beyond just a Jossverse-driven community by now, IMO.


billytea - Sep 20, 2002 9:51:16 pm PDT #124 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

Is it a community primarily focused on the Jossiverse shows, or has it already expanded into something which (like Literary Buffistas) wants to discuss other topics within this community.

I tend to think both are true. The primary focus is still the Jossverse, but the relative weights between Joss and non-Joss have been steadily changing for some time. Which is good, because it bodes well for longer-term survival.

Which also means that I don’t feel a need to force the issue. Natural growth from a broad consensus of Buffista interest will work fine, IMO.

Politics is also a very different beast than, say, a new show, or even a general movies thread. I'm much more likely to change my opinion of a person based on whether he approves of John Ashcroft's stomping on the Bill of Rights than on whether she thinks Kristen Kreuk can act. Many more opportunities for flame-age, for troll-attract-age, for bad feeling-age. I'm with the nay-age.

ITA. I don’t mind it being discussed in Natter, interestingly, because I think the awareness that the thread is not politics-specific, that there are other people reading aside from those interested in the discussion, and the topic could be changed at any moment, act as a constraint on antisocial behaviour. I’m probably just funny like that.

Meanwhile, I’m kind of tickled that I got a post deleted and yet the last one (where the on-topic thing was a blatant warding of the Evil Eye) got to stay.