Tara: What's so bad about them coming here? Aren't they good guys? I mean, Watchers, that's just like whole other Gileses, right? Buffy: Yes! They're scary and horrible!

'Potential'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


DavidS - Sep 20, 2002 5:01:54 pm PDT #119 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

A thought occurs to me now as I contemplate the demise of The 11th Hour.

Another possible thrust for the Buffistas would be to reverse the usual dynamic: content board, with discussion boards attached. So we start as a discussion board, then create content (that is, longer articles etc.).

I'm just kicking it around. I've enjoyed things like The 11th Hour and especially their quirky survey articles, and Omar's Smallville Recaps on TWOP. We've discussed creating a backlog of Anyas as a kind of Snarky Cliff Notes Guide to Buffy and Angel. It might be nice to create a space for us to write about genre shows within Phoenix. Of course, we could always just throw up some links, but I'm thinking of something that would exist within the community.


Burrell - Sep 20, 2002 5:32:48 pm PDT #120 of 10001
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!

Actually, there is already a lot of good content being generated by Buffistae, so I could definitely see us eventually putting out a little something. And despite the glaring evidence to the contrary, I really didn't mean that to sound quite so porny.


Typo Boy - Sep 20, 2002 5:41:09 pm PDT #121 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Maybe this could combine with the politics thing. We cou ld have a Buffista on-line zine to which critiques of shows, movies, books, politics, social issue whatever could be submitted . Only Buffistas could submit (participants only or lurkers as well?). Someone would act as editor, accpeting, rejecting or sending back for rewrite.

Hell, ita has always been the Buffista to whom I would most like to submit.


DavidS - Sep 20, 2002 6:19:13 pm PDT #122 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Hell, ita has always been the Buffista to whom I would most like to submit.

Ple's got my vote.


Steph L. - Sep 20, 2002 7:05:13 pm PDT #123 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

Another possible thrust for the Buffistas would be to reverse the usual dynamic: content board, with discussion boards attached. So we start as a discussion board, then create content (that is, longer articles etc.).

Consuela and Dana have already written pieces of this nature, on genre TV, that are on a site similar to 11th Hour. We *certainly* have the resources here to create such writing. We also have editors here, and people who can make it all look pretty.

We're well beyond just a Jossverse-driven community by now, IMO.


billytea - Sep 20, 2002 9:51:16 pm PDT #124 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

Is it a community primarily focused on the Jossiverse shows, or has it already expanded into something which (like Literary Buffistas) wants to discuss other topics within this community.

I tend to think both are true. The primary focus is still the Jossverse, but the relative weights between Joss and non-Joss have been steadily changing for some time. Which is good, because it bodes well for longer-term survival.

Which also means that I don’t feel a need to force the issue. Natural growth from a broad consensus of Buffista interest will work fine, IMO.

Politics is also a very different beast than, say, a new show, or even a general movies thread. I'm much more likely to change my opinion of a person based on whether he approves of John Ashcroft's stomping on the Bill of Rights than on whether she thinks Kristen Kreuk can act. Many more opportunities for flame-age, for troll-attract-age, for bad feeling-age. I'm with the nay-age.

ITA. I don’t mind it being discussed in Natter, interestingly, because I think the awareness that the thread is not politics-specific, that there are other people reading aside from those interested in the discussion, and the topic could be changed at any moment, act as a constraint on antisocial behaviour. I’m probably just funny like that.

Meanwhile, I’m kind of tickled that I got a post deleted and yet the last one (where the on-topic thing was a blatant warding of the Evil Eye) got to stay.


John H - Sep 20, 2002 10:19:06 pm PDT #125 of 10001

The weird thing about the "shall we feature content" discussion is that all the boards elsewhere are an attempt to Build Community as an add-on to a content site, which is really a way to Make People Keep Coming Back, and indeed Make People Keep Hitting Refresh, so that you get more hits and more ad views.

The board is an add-on to the content, in other words. It's a fascinating idea that content could spring out of the boards.


DXMachina - Sep 20, 2002 10:48:46 pm PDT #126 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

It's a fascinating idea that content could spring out of the boards.

We've already done this a little bit with the filk site and the Buff Dive site, plus there have been articley type things like Brian's article on Vampire Ecology and Dana's analysis of OMWF. I think it's a great idea. I know of at least two people who found us through the filk site (I even met one of them tonight).


Fiona - Sep 21, 2002 2:47:34 am PDT #127 of 10001

I don't want to be the Voice of Doom here, but one thing to bear in mind: the bigger and more diverse Buffistas.org gets, sooner or later the issue of funding will raise its head. And I'd hate for this community to break up because of something so profane as money.

It's probably just worth considering. If things are handled right it may not be a problem. But I'm sure it's one of the reasons why other sites like 11th Hr. and (I think?) TWoP are closing down.


Jesse - Sep 21, 2002 9:24:43 am PDT #128 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

We don't have any paid staff, obviously, so I guess the question is how much can we grow and stay all-volunteer? When does the workload become too great for people to handle at work/in their free time?