Yeah, let me just remind myself to not get arrested in a foriegn country where I don't know my rights. Eek. (Not that I do want to get arrested in America either, but...) cause...
However, they do inform you of your right to have a "brief" when you're being booked in at the station
I'd be all "Um, brief what? Brief smoke? Pair of briefs? Legal brief, pick one off the shelf?" (And how weird does brief look when typed more than once? Very weird!)
Yeah, let me just remind myself to not get arrested in a foriegn country where I don't know my rights. Eek.
meara, unless things have really improved? The one to avoid is Switzerland. They can toss you in a cell, give you no contact, keep you there for 72 hours, and escort you to the border. And they aren't obliged by their own law to tell you why.
This actually happened to a friend of mine, a high-visibility lawyer, back in the early eighties. Turned out to be her last name: she was married to someone with the same last name as the old royal family of Yugoslavia, and several of them had been banned from Switzerland. Barbara didn't find this out until she'd been escorted to the French border and told never to come back. Weirdness....
meara ... "brief" is UK-TV slang for a solicitor.
Darn. I liked the idea of the prisoner demanding a quickie with the bobby of her choice.
Yeah, let me just remind myself to not get arrested in a foriegn country where I don't know my rights. Eek. (Not that I do want to get arrested in America either, but...) cause...
We're not a fun country to get arrested in as a foreign national, either. :(
I think the English promise to use what you
don't
say against you is also permitted in American trials, but I'm not sure. You can't use the fact that someone asked for an attorney, but if during questioning the suspect didn't mention the alibi he came up with for trial? That's probative.
We're not a fun country to get arrested in as a foreign national, either
Oh, totally...especially the past year or three. But at least here I vaguely know my rights. :)
the US has a constitution. It isn't stopping John Ashcroft, so far as i can see.
IIRC, someone has to be busted and then make a challenge on constitutional grounds before a law can be chucked for being unconstitutional.
(A little scenario the NRA delights in ignoring.)
IIRC, someone has to be busted and then make a challenge on constitutional grounds before a law can be chucked for being unconstitutional.
Yes, American courts can only rule on Actual Cases. Other countries' courts-- including the Intl Court of Justice-- can issue advisory opinions, which don't require a case to be before it. I think this is becaue precedent is not controlling in those systems, but I'm not sure.
Popping in very quickly before I have to run off to take care of crap.
Waking the Dead is good. My Tuesdays are made even better by it. But Cracker rocks my Wednesdays. I'm watching it right now AIFG!
Really? That seems convoluted! Why?
Dear God, woman!
Because!
Because it's always been that way! The UK common law needs no greater reason.
Nutty - have you read the original
Homicide
book? There's fantastic sequence where Simon explains that there are
no circumstances whatsoever
where waiving your right of silence isn't a dumb-ass move.
And you're watching
Cracker?
Which one? It may be my favourite ever UK show.
To Be a Somebody
teaches you more about Britain in the '80s than any 10 history books. Plus it was an amazing school - Ecclestone, Carlisle, Morton, Boyle...