Okay, does anyone think there's something we're not getting here? Besides the WTF of not noticing. I mean, dogs don't just go and do that.
I wonder how long it had been since the dog had been fed.
You tell me: real, or not?
I haven't followed the link yet, but if it's fake they've been faking for years and years. I remember seeing photos from this competition when I was a kid.
The Muhammad cartoon thing is insane. I think the publishing of the cartoons was highly inadvisable, but rioting/kidnapping/etc. over a cartoon? I thought the prohibition on images of Muhammad was to prevent worship of him. How is this not a variation on idolatry?
Um... is this still a democracy?
You think it *has* been, since the joke that was the 2000 election?
Um... is this still a democracy?
You think it *has* been, since the joke that was the 2000 election?
Um... OK, is this still a country where our president... has to follow laws? (Whatever you call the opposite of a dictatorship?)
Those are very, very difficult questions, and for me to answer those questions sort of off the cuff
The question "Can the President do illegal stuff whenever he wants?" is NOT a fucking difficult question. Fucker.
Maybe she should threaten to torture him till he answers?
But a lot of America is really irony-deficient. It would blow up in her face.
What's confusing me is why isn't Gonzales just lying?
Oh, you mean like "Of course not."(wink, wink)
Don't know.
Um... OK, is this still a country where our president... has to follow laws?
Jeez, tommy, it's like you don't even bother to listen. If it's the president who's doing it, it is
by definition
following the law. It's like the papacy, but with extra infallibility.
Dear Mr. Attorney man,
When you send an email to yourself, and not to me, it really doesn't matter that you sent at 10:30 or that you marked it RUSH. It's still not going to get done.
OKThanxBye
Me
Dear Monday,
EAT IT AND DIE!
OKThanxBye
Me
Jeez, tommy, it's like you don't even bother to listen. If it's the president who's doing it, it is by definition following the law.
But... but... but... now I'm confused. Is there some exception to this, where we must enforce the rule of law on the president if the issue involved blowjobs?