I think Love at First Sight is still just desire that happens to be inspired by a person that was also otherwise a good match.
Do you mean that the desire is part of a bigger feeling, or it's just desire that grows up to be something romantic?
I think Love At First Sight is just desire that got lucky in the other areas of human relations. Someone lights your fire, and then you get to know the person, and hey, he's a terrific person, too. I should probably choose your second option, above, and would except given the context of Matt's original statement on it...
(a) I mean something more than romantic--romantic sure, but with sort of devotion, trust and companionship of a good friendship, too.
(b) I think there's a distinction between Love At First Sight, and what happens with people who are both pretty and find each other pretty, and start out as friends first, and then date.
and
(c) I'm a pain in the ass.
Oh, haaaaaaa. Guess whose fileserver just crashed? Guess who has to go to work tomorrow?
This
girl.
But, how is that the show's fault? How can they prove that ABC didn't fulfill their end of the promise, which was to provide a home. They built it, they paid for it, the construction company paid off the mortgage. The responsibility lies with the foster parents. Maybe ABC should sue them for fraud. They applied to be on the show with the understanding they were getting a house to support their foster children. If it is proven that they purposefully and maliciously caused those children to move out due to the parent's actions, ABC should swoop in and take it back.
In sum: I suspect that romantic love may be a subset of sex with a lot of higher cortical function dancing around madly trying to distract us from this unflattering truth.
I agree with this completely, but I think the key word here is subset. Because seeing someone with a cute butt on the street and thinking "Break me off a piece of THAT" isn't love. Unless I've been doing it wrong all this time.
In sum: I suspect that romantic love may be a subset of sex with a lot of higher cortical function dancing around madly trying to distract us from this unflattering truth.
I agree with this completely, but I think the key word here is subset. Because seeing someone with a cute butt on the street and thinking "Break me off a piece of THAT" isn't love. Unless I've been doing it wrong all this time.
I think a Venn diagram is called for here.
From my experience, love at first sight, nah. But actually that is a confusing question for me, as I have attractions off the internets often...is the first f2f meeting "first sight" because by then I've known what's in the package, if not the Package, for some time.
If first sight means first f2f than yeah, maybe.
In sum: I suspect that romantic love may be a subset of sex with a lot of higher cortical function dancing around madly trying to distract us from this unflattering truth.
I disagree, if what you're saying is that love is some kind of masked sexual attraction. And if not, please clarify.
But what I'm trying to do is sever romantic love from the physical attraction equation. It's a whole different vibe.
For some. But there is some choice even in my physical attraction stuff. Some of it is petty and stupid and some of it isn't. Like, maybe, kicked a cat or a dog = off the physical attraction. Or, has a great voice, henh, I like voices. Or my favorite, likes me first = I am attracted back.
But it's been since I was 16 since I was attracted to someone who was toxic for me. And that pretty much taught me that I should be careful and picky about choosing people to even think about getting groiny with.
(and admittedly, I'm a control freak who grew up in the Midwestern House of Suppression.)
But, how is that the show's fault?
I dunno. I think it would be interesting to read the pleadings and see what the language in the contract is.
