Well some friends of Buffy played a funny joke and they took her stuff and now she wants us to help get it back from her friends who sleep all day and have no tans.

Xander ,'Lessons'


Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!

Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.


Lee - May 14, 2005 7:33:58 pm PDT #781 of 10458
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

Spike actually had at least partial sex with Harmony, before she went nuts, in the ep with the toner replacement guy.


Gus - May 14, 2005 7:43:18 pm PDT #782 of 10458
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Partial sex with Harmony ...

Wait. I can't get past 'partial sex'. That is an exceedingly strange phrase.

Everyone who had whole sex after the initial relationship wins.

All you partial sex proponents are welcome to a partial win.


§ ita § - May 14, 2005 7:50:48 pm PDT #783 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I bet Riley would have liked, in theory, to have had as intense sex with Buffy as Spike did.

Not that his grain-fed self could handle it, but still. Neither of the relationships (NONE of her relationships) were good healthy ones, but Riley could have benefitted from a bit of the old S&M with her. Vulnerability, et al.


Gus - May 14, 2005 8:13:49 pm PDT #784 of 10458
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

t kicks picture of Riley with Skinny Vampire Girl out of his head


Gris - May 14, 2005 8:57:12 pm PDT #785 of 10458
Hey. New board.

I bet Buffy and Riley had pretty intense sex in that one episode where their lust was supporting the pain of a thousand ghosts or whatever.

Man, I hated that episode.

But I hated Smashed more.

So Buffy+Riley intense sex is better than Buffy+Spike, by my logic.


§ ita § - May 14, 2005 8:58:51 pm PDT #786 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

For me it doesn't count as emotionally intense when you're possessed/driven by ghosts.

But that's just me and my sex life. I don't mean to speak for everyone.


Gris - May 14, 2005 9:17:13 pm PDT #787 of 10458
Hey. New board.

If I remember the episode correctly (doubtful), weren't the ghosts brought into a more powerful existence because of their lust first? They made them focus on it more, but it had to be there before they noticed. I mean, the ghosts weren't coming out for any of the other sex-having couples in that frat house, and there had to be several. Graham, at least, seemed like a playa. Even if you argue it was the Slayer, specifically, being lustful that caused them to latch on, it still seems she must have been feeling it pretty good.

t /still love Riley and screw you all


Gus - May 14, 2005 9:41:45 pm PDT #788 of 10458
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

There has to be some point to this conversation.

OK, maybe not.

BuffyNImmotal4EVAH!!!!one!


§ ita § - May 14, 2005 10:03:42 pm PDT #789 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Hot sex does not have to be emotionally intense.


P.M. Marc - May 14, 2005 11:00:34 pm PDT #790 of 10458
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Hot sex does not have to be emotionally intense.

Too true.