This is not funny. This... this is a morality tale about the evils of sake.

Simon ,'Objects In Space'


Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!

Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.


Gris - May 14, 2005 8:57:12 pm PDT #785 of 10458
Hey. New board.

I bet Buffy and Riley had pretty intense sex in that one episode where their lust was supporting the pain of a thousand ghosts or whatever.

Man, I hated that episode.

But I hated Smashed more.

So Buffy+Riley intense sex is better than Buffy+Spike, by my logic.


§ ita § - May 14, 2005 8:58:51 pm PDT #786 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

For me it doesn't count as emotionally intense when you're possessed/driven by ghosts.

But that's just me and my sex life. I don't mean to speak for everyone.


Gris - May 14, 2005 9:17:13 pm PDT #787 of 10458
Hey. New board.

If I remember the episode correctly (doubtful), weren't the ghosts brought into a more powerful existence because of their lust first? They made them focus on it more, but it had to be there before they noticed. I mean, the ghosts weren't coming out for any of the other sex-having couples in that frat house, and there had to be several. Graham, at least, seemed like a playa. Even if you argue it was the Slayer, specifically, being lustful that caused them to latch on, it still seems she must have been feeling it pretty good.

t /still love Riley and screw you all


Gus - May 14, 2005 9:41:45 pm PDT #788 of 10458
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

There has to be some point to this conversation.

OK, maybe not.

BuffyNImmotal4EVAH!!!!one!


§ ita § - May 14, 2005 10:03:42 pm PDT #789 of 10458
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Hot sex does not have to be emotionally intense.


P.M. Marc - May 14, 2005 11:00:34 pm PDT #790 of 10458
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Hot sex does not have to be emotionally intense.

Too true.


Am-Chau Yarkona - May 14, 2005 11:02:46 pm PDT #791 of 10458
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty

Love's hard to quantify, but I think that she didn't love Riley as much as she wanted to, and that she loved Spike more than she wanted to.


Gris - May 15, 2005 6:49:09 am PDT #792 of 10458
Hey. New board.

Hmm. Guess we were using different meanings of "intense." I was just thinking "hot."

Sorry if I came off belligerent last night. Sobriety was not part of the equation.


brenda m - May 15, 2005 6:52:11 am PDT #793 of 10458
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

I was just thinking "hot."

Hot? Their anti-chemistry literally put the fire out in the room.


SailAweigh - May 15, 2005 6:54:25 am PDT #794 of 10458
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

Heh, I always felt there was more chemistry between Riley and Buffy than there was between Angel and Buffy, at least. But yeah, anti-hot all the way. Heck, Riley and the Vamp!Ho was hotter than Riley and Buffy.