Lorne: Back in Pylea they used to call me "sweet potato." Connor: Really. Lorne: Yeah, well, the exact translation was "fragrant tuber" but…

'Conviction (1)'


Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


quester - Jun 01, 2007 7:11:04 pm PDT #9508 of 10001
Danger is my middle name, only I spell it R. u. t. h. - Tina Belcher.

I love all of the TV threads and am bereft without them! wah!


Aims - Jun 01, 2007 7:12:53 pm PDT #9509 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

I think that the box on the left hand side for our published authors is a great idea and my "second" can be counted on.


erikaj - Jun 01, 2007 10:10:20 pm PDT #9510 of 10001
Always Anti-fascist!

Not sure where I stand yet, although I personally used Cable Drama and Comedy most. I want "Who Am I Kidding? I love to brag." for the new GWW name, when there is. Y'all just tell me what corner to stand on and I'll show up, ignorant opinions and all. Perhaps this is a Wirefiend inside joke but I'd be tickled by "Bureau XX: The Commander Likes the Dots." But probably three people in the world would think that was funny.


erikaj - Jun 01, 2007 10:19:51 pm PDT #9511 of 10001
Always Anti-fascist!

Ed Gein: Also, I sort of miss letting thread discussion kind of...morph, into whatever it was going to be. But that is easy for me to say, as I was one of the miscreants who crufted up the Movies thread with in-jokes, vulgarity and heng mai(crosses fingers) It was probably not as fun for all the people metaphorically stranded on the corner or at the Gem against their wills, though."Aw, man, it's frickin' Monday and they're doing it again..." I miss the *intimacy*(giggle, giggle) of former days. Although, I also appreciate the new level of focus. So. This post is probably useless


esse - Jun 02, 2007 1:14:11 am PDT #9512 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

OK, leaving aside any possible thematic similarities (and I think there are a great deal in the shows that seem to get MOST discussed from both), there's also the fact that unlike most of the Network Drama shows (not all, certainly, but most), the cable and premium cable shows get broadcast multiple times during the week, so you don't even need to DVR or TIVO them when they are first broadcast, which leads to a far greater disparity in the viewing time for folks.

Yeah. Though I would stress again the thematics, as well as the audience, also contribute to my own wish to have Premium and Cable together.

I really, strongly disagree that they should be kept apart under the reasoning that, some point in the future, someone might purchase a Premium show and watch it. In the future. For those of us who have been using the experimentals over the last month, and Boxed Set and Movies before that, we learned to skip around the thread to read the shows we watched, or the shows we didn't get spoiled for. Addressing the whitefront policy might ease some of this. But I really don't think possible spoilers--for something that might be watched, feasibly, a year after it was originally aired--is a strong reason for not folding Cable into Premium. Particularly when the posting volume of both threads is so low that remaining unspoiled is pretty straightforward. The shows from Premium and Cable do not inspire watch and posts. They inspire, as someone noted above, more thought-out and robust discussion. I think that discussion dovetails very nicely together, and thus will propose myself that they are put together once we have drawn whatever conclusions we need to draw from this discussion.

I am also not sure what, exactly, we are meant to be doing here. Cindy proposed the experimentals with a view to collecting data, if I recalled correctly. And it's a month later, and I suppose we have what data we might feasibly need. But thus far in the discussion, of those who have participated in the discussion, it seems like the broad categories established work well enough for our purposes. We have a focused place to discuss television. We obviously are discussing that television with each other. More than once, in the threads, there were posts of "oh! I get to talk about x now!", which was pretty cool, to give a platform for that discussion.

I mean, what categories do we need, other than the ones we used before? The categories that were created in experiementals worked surprisingly well for what they were, and the issue as I see it seems to be the spoiler policy.

I think that, like it or not, the substantive change was made when we created the experimental threads. It was a try-out, but it was a try-out that, in my opinion, succeeded. And people have figured those threads out now--you know where to go to discuss x. It seems like a shame to take that away when it worked for our needs, such as they are. Particularly when we don't seem to have another category system, from previous discussion, that works as well or is as agreed upon. (For example, days of the week thread would be impossible, for the number of people who ahem or tivo. It is impossible for me to keep track of what network things are on, because my own television view is far, far removed from both a television and airing schedules.)

And in addition to that, I think that, just like Boxed Set, setting up bucket threads such as they are doesn't prohibit new, more specific threads for being created. If (ha!) Law and Order started taking over Network to the point that you couldn't sneeze without discussion of D'Onofrio, then someone proposes a L&O thread. If--though I don't think this is particularly likely--Network is taken over by people who only discuss House and Grey's Anatomy and the medical relevance of these shows, then you create a medical drama thread. There's no reason to think that the same threads used to collect data cannot *still* be used to collect data, by allowing discussion to wander as it does and the need for threads arise when they do. Why do we need (continued...)


esse - Jun 02, 2007 1:14:14 am PDT #9513 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

( continues...) a permanent solution now?

And finally, I don't particularly want to spend the entire summer talking about this, because my summer has a handful of shows that will be airing that I will want to talk about. Just because we've gotten through sweeps, and the networks have gone to hibernate, doesn't mean there isn't television to watch or to talk about. Hell, even re-runs generate discussion. So I think that, in the interest of fostering that discussion, and taking in to account the general (if unintended) success of the threads, that creating threads along the lines of what was set up in Experimentals is not a bad idea at all. Particularly since I think we've already made the substantive change, even if we didn't mean for it to be so.


le nubian - Jun 02, 2007 2:37:34 am PDT #9514 of 10001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

I really liked the experimental threads and would love for all of them to return in one way, shape, or form. I couldn't care less if cable drama is in premium or not. It seems to me that one reason to make this distinction is if premium or cable drama are each getting so much traffic that there might be a need to break the threads up.

So I come down on the traffic side, not necessarily the thematic side - but that is an important point as well.

I'm just so pleased I had the opportunity to engage in discussion with all of you in a variety of threads.

I would probably be the fourth 2nd, but I am holding it until more discussion takes place since that is an upthread request.


brenda m - Jun 02, 2007 2:43:59 am PDT #9515 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

It seems to me that one reason to make this distinction is if premium or cable drama are each getting so much traffic that there might be a need to break the threads up.

Yeah, I guess to me it's more a question of justifying separate threads than anything. "I may one day buy it on DVD" is not the most compelling argument, I have to say (and I intend to one day buy lots of them on DVD).

But to get to specifics - there was whitefont in the experimental cable drama thread. Is there in Premium? I'm guessing not. What sort of whitefont arrangements would people want if we were to merge those two threads? Thoughts?


esse - Jun 02, 2007 3:02:55 am PDT #9516 of 10001
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

"I may one day buy it on DVD" is not the most compelling argument, I have to say

not to mention you could argue it in the face of any show we talk about. I don't see why premium shows should get special treatment.

There is no whitefront policy for Premium. To tell the truth, it hasn't been much of an issue--discussion doesn't always take place the day of, or during a show. It tends to creep in during the week, more of a meander than a focused flurry. So, in my opinion, whitefront hasn't been necessary.

That can probably be shifted if Cable is folded in, but I kind of want to know what the Cable folks think about the whitefront they used before changing the Premium settings.


sj - Jun 02, 2007 4:11:52 am PDT #9517 of 10001
"There are few hours in life more agreeable than the hour dedicated to the ceremony known as afternoon tea."

"I may one day buy it on DVD" is not the most compelling argument, I have to say

not to mention you could argue it in the face of any show we talk about. I don't see why premium shows should get special treatment.

Some of us don't get the premium stations, and, therefore, don't get the choice of watching it the first time around.