I consense for No Consensus
We're deep in space, corner of No and Where.
Mal ,'Objects In Space'
Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
juliana - Aug 20, 2004 8:14:41 am PDT #1918 of 10001
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…
DavidS - Aug 20, 2004 8:16:30 am PDT #1919 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
I'm for DXM picking.
There was a kind of consensus about the one like "Didn't we already do the three squared one before?" (however that was phrased)
I remember four or five people liking that, which is pretty nearly a landslide in thread title selection. Seems a shame to waste a good number like 27 on "No Consensus." Soon we're going to get to numbers which have no cultural associations whatsoever. Or...one association like 57 and Heinz.
billytea - Aug 20, 2004 8:20:05 am PDT #1920 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
Natter 27: An Unholy Alliance of Actuaries and Australians
I just changed my tag. Now I have to go change it again?
Signed, the Unholy Alliance
Soon we're going to get to numbers which have no cultural associations whatsoever.
I'm looking forward to this. The numerical references are getting old, and kind of forced.
Jesse - Aug 20, 2004 8:26:16 am PDT #1921 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Come on, David, the people LOVE No consensus. Live it, love it.
Topic!Cindy - Aug 20, 2004 8:26:54 am PDT #1922 of 10001
What is even happening?
Jesse, what's your platform?
Jesse - Aug 20, 2004 8:29:26 am PDT #1923 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Everyone wins!
DXMachina - Aug 20, 2004 8:30:35 am PDT #1924 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Tiny Buffista flags for everyone!
JenP - Aug 20, 2004 8:33:29 am PDT #1925 of 10001
No Consensus is the consensus not a waste!
plants flag firmly in Jesse's corner, the corner of No Consensus
DavidS - Aug 20, 2004 8:33:40 am PDT #1926 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Come on, David, the people LOVE No consensus. Live it, love it.
27 just seems like such a juicy number, ripe with possibilities. "No Consensus" displays a failure of imagination. (and consensus. Except for the people who have consensed upon "No Consensus" which is a kind of self-negating loop.)
Jesse - Aug 20, 2004 8:35:20 am PDT #1927 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Ah, but you're missing the inherent Buffista beauty of No consensus. With No consensus, you can remain secure in your knowledge that your chosen title was the One True Natter 27 Title, and everyone else is just crackpots.