Yes! Ohmigod! Someone's blondie bear's a twenty-question genius!

Harmony ,'Help'


F2F 2: Is there anybody here that hasn't slept together?  

Plan what to do, what to wear (you can never go wrong with a corset), and get ready for the next BuffistaCon: New Orleans! May 20-22, 2005!


Java cat - Sep 28, 2004 8:51:23 am PDT #9109 of 9999
Not javachik

True.


§ ita § - Sep 28, 2004 8:52:02 am PDT #9110 of 9999
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

47 people wanted to not be in heat and humidity in May.

Is that why they all voted the way they did? I figured some of them may have other criteria on their list too.


Steph L. - Sep 28, 2004 8:52:06 am PDT #9111 of 9999
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

Huh, 47 people wanted to not be in heat and humidity in May.

That can't be extrapolated from the results.


billytea - Sep 28, 2004 8:55:37 am PDT #9112 of 9999
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

That can't be extrapolated from the results.

True. Nor can we extrapolate that this is not the case. But with ranking, we could! For such situations, where no option gets close to 50% of the vote, was preferential voting designed!!

Nah, just ignore me. I can't attend the next one anyway. Ranking gave us the Sydney Olympics.

Sorry. Stopping now.


Vortex - Sep 28, 2004 9:04:13 am PDT #9113 of 9999
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

Perhaps some people decided that there were other things to consider than the weather.


Nora Deirdre - Sep 28, 2004 9:07:00 am PDT #9114 of 9999
I’m responsible for my own happiness? I can’t even be responsible for my own breakfast! (Bojack Horseman)

what are the dates again for the F2F?


Jon B. - Sep 28, 2004 9:11:36 am PDT #9115 of 9999
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

May 20-22.

I just changed the thread header to reflect the 2005 info.


Lyra Jane - Sep 28, 2004 9:51:45 am PDT #9116 of 9999
Up with the sun

I voted for KC instead of NO because a)KC is cheaper and b)I've been to NO and liked it and been to KC and not liked it, so I wanted to give KC a second chance. That said, the heat in NO didn't really enter into it -- I figure it's only three days, and we probably won't be outside THAT much. And I say that as someone who's pretty heat-sensitive.

(I wouldn't have minded ranking, though.)


deborah grabien - Sep 28, 2004 10:43:10 am PDT #9117 of 9999
It really doesn't matter. It's just an opinion. Don't worry about it. Not worth the hassle.

I didn't vote for NO and I have to admit, the NO heat was a factor in mine; my neuro says it's one of the worst climates in America if you have MS.

Beyond that, other reasons, definitely, but for me, the weather was, in fact, a factor.


Matt the Bruins fan - Sep 28, 2004 10:45:04 am PDT #9118 of 9999
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

I'll hate the weather at that time of year, but plan to be too inebriated to mind all that much. Plus, it's an excuse to wear skimpier clothing.