River: You're not right, Early. You're not righteous. You've got issues. Early: No. Oh, yes, I could have that. You might have me figured out, then. Good job. I'm not 100%.

'Objects In Space'


Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.  

This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.


P.M. Marc - Sep 02, 2004 6:53:35 am PDT #8909 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

The part where she was fleeing gives it a different vibe for me, though.

On the bright side, at least Angelus didn't stick her in the fridge.

Has it been mentioned onscreen, ever, that he wasn't dead? I mean, in rebuttal to the claim he was?

Nope, I don't believe so. Unless you count Willow's "And that all worked out okay..." in Selfless.


§ ita § - Sep 02, 2004 6:57:33 am PDT #8910 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I am very down with the idea that you can play a part in the big battle against evil without being able to do a single physical thing. Hence my irritation with the superification of Cordelia.

Sure, there are Justines and Gunns, but Wesleys and Freds need bigger weapons.

Jenny couldn't have done a damned thing to save her life, but she was fighting the good fight, in a very valuable way, and as such, she was a combatant in the larger sense, in the way I parse things.

Being physically vulnerable is not being powerless.


Strega - Sep 02, 2004 6:59:59 am PDT #8911 of 10001

Gandalfe, I sent you the spreadsheet. There's also a zipped copy (it's an Excel file) on my site here if anyone cares. (It's just zipped out of habit; it's not like it's a big file.)

Their list of recurring characters seems goofier every time I look at it, so have many grains of salt handy, but Good/Bad/Other breakdown...

Buffy
22 villains: 6 women, 16 men. This doesn't include Allan Finch (RIP), Willy, or Parker, because I couldn't decide which side to put them on. 3 of the 6 women were killed. 14 of the 16 men were killed. (6 by Buffy.)

31 heroes: 15 women, 16 men. 7 of the 15 women were killed. 4 of the 16 men were killed.

Angel
17 villains: 6 women, 11 men. Left in the ambiguous category: Illyria, Justine, Holtz (RIP), and Merl (RIP). 3 of the 6 women were killed. 11 of the 11 men were killed. (But only 3 by Angel. Loser!)

15 heroes: 6 women, 9 men. 2 of the 6 women were killed. 2 of the 9 men were killed.

I wonder if I can add a column for # of episodes... hm.


Fred Pete - Sep 02, 2004 7:04:39 am PDT #8912 of 10001
Ann, that's a ferret.

So one thing is clear -- if you're a male, it's much healthier to be a hero.


Strega - Sep 02, 2004 7:14:45 am PDT #8913 of 10001

Yes. And it's extremely unhealthy to date Angel. I just realized this morning that if you fall in love with Angel, you'll kill yourself. Or at the very least, deliberately do something that causes your own death.

So Lindsey was doomed no matter what...


Lyra Jane - Sep 02, 2004 7:23:47 am PDT #8914 of 10001
Up with the sun

With the exception of Xander and (after S3) Giles, all the characters you identified with were always women

I think it's possible to identify with Oz or Riley (pre-vamp ho visits) at least as much as it's possible to identify with Tara or Anya -- all four are on the show as romantic partners. But like ita, I don't really identify with anyone, so I'm not sure I'm right about this. Why do you think the women are easier to identify with?


Matt the Bruins fan - Sep 02, 2004 7:33:03 am PDT #8915 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Yes. And it's extremely unhealthy to date Angel. I just realized this morning that if you fall in love with Angel, you'll kill yourself. Or at the very least, deliberately do something that causes your own death.

Hmm. If we count self preservation instinct-free curiousity, this even applies to Fred. She and Angel did go out to the movies together and then again for ice cream.

So Lindsey was doomed no matter what...

I think Lindsey was aiming for suicide via dating Angel.


Gris - Sep 02, 2004 9:14:43 am PDT #8916 of 10001
Hey. New board.

And, since the discussion originally began with "sure seems like the creators might be sexist," do we have to skew the fact that it's KNOWN that they wanted to kill Oz eventually and also that it's KNOWN that, barring that, Joss sure wanted to bring Tara back and Amber said "no"? (A fact of which I'm glad, personally.) Assuming, of course, we're only counting "permanently dead" as "dead."

And what makes a character someone we personally invest in, anyway? Why was Darla loved more than Holtz, so that we count her death as important but his as not? He, too, was often portrayed sympathetically, probably more often than Darla was. But the writing and acting didn't get under our skin as much, or else his death might have had more significance. I, personally, had no emotion when they killed Cordy, for that matter, as she had already been dead by bad writing in my head for ages (any emotion I had was entirely for Angel, not for personal investment in Cordy by that point).

And Fred, rather than Wesley or Gunn or Knox, had to be Illyria's victim so that Illyria could be the hot exotic goddess that she is. Girl gods are prettier. This makes perfect sense in my mind.


Polter-Cow - Sep 02, 2004 9:19:05 am PDT #8917 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

But the writing and acting didn't get under our skin as much, or else his death might have had more significance.

Holtz's death had tremendous significance, but not in the traditional sense. What was important was not that he died, but how he died.

Actually, now that I think about it, his death propelling Connor's motivations is kind of like Tara's death propelling Willow's. Except Tara didn't leave Willow a fucked up letter.


Am-Chau Yarkona - Sep 02, 2004 9:33:56 am PDT #8918 of 10001
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty

Strega, that's a very fine spreadsheet. I'm interested to see that you've included both Ben and Glory, as seperate characters, but you've got Glory down as 'g' (for 'good', I assume), and Ben down as 'e' for evil. Probably the right choice-- to include both-- but I'm pretty sure they ought to be the other way around on the g/e thing.