When Spike was leaving Sunnydale he said he wanted her to get what she deserved.
But when he was in front of the demon who ended up giving him the soul he said he wanted to be what he was.
That's two different things.
This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.
When Spike was leaving Sunnydale he said he wanted her to get what she deserved.
But when he was in front of the demon who ended up giving him the soul he said he wanted to be what he was.
That's two different things.
Shoot! I missed the beginning ... of the end, (sob!).
First 50?
Heh. Barely.
I can't help it with the Andrew love.
I used to be him.
Dude, I've *seen* your purity test results. No way were you Andrew. Unless Andrew had a really interesting Mardi Gras.
And yeah, I'm a total Andrew fangirl.
The explanation from the writers was that Spike knew he was going to get his soul. Eh. I'm not as anti-that interpretation as others have been, but they weren't clear.
Man, ita's redundant today.
I'm not as anti-that interpretation as others have been, but they weren't clear.
I'm not either. I think it was poorly executed by the writers, the directors and the actor, but I knew it all along. It was a sloppy misdirection.
WRT Andrew, I would rather have seen Jonathan live. I have to admit I've enjoyed Andrew, but I resent him being as prominent when there's so little time left. I think I would have not felt so resentful had Jonathan filled up all this time. But I really wouldn't have wanted to see Jonathan kill Andrew - I wouldn't have wanted Jonathan to fall that far. So - eh.
Man, ita's redundant today.
I just thought she really wanted to make that point. It was a good point.
Another problem with the unsouled vs. souled Spike argument for me is that I see very little difference in behavior between the two. Seems like the same guy to me.