Wash ,'Jaynestown'
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Has to? Has to? Please do not presume how I intend to vote.
I have no horse in this race at all, but in the interest of smoothing feathers, I think what was meant that the person thinks it is silly that we have to vote at all, not that we each feel that we need to vote yes because of external pressure.
Thank you, Sophia.
Quick cameo to say that I don't think saying we support the writers in any way implies that we don't support the crews. I think once we decide if we want to show our support for the WGA, we can certainly consider a separate proposal saying that we also support the crews and such.
ETA: A kind of "Bring everyone back to work" or something. Not sure. But I agree with the spirit of ND's desire to support beyond the writers; I just don't think the two are mutually exclusive.
No, they weren't
I considered it. I viewed the ongoing discussion on the topic as consideration. How are you defining the term?
I just don't see your logical fallacy. Could you dumb it down a bit for me?
By the way, the idea of putting the logo where the random quotes is? A great idea.
But we need the random quotes.
But we need the random quotes.
For what?
Okay, we are going to do away with them permanently?
That really kind of sucks.
I just like them.
Why not put the link above the "Message Center" title.
I admit, my CSS styling of the site has no quotes in it, so I'm more used to not seeing them, but I think the pointedness is quite apropos.
Okay, we are going to do away with them permanently?
The only thing I've seen suggested is Quotes Will Return When Writers Are Back To Work. Totally different vibe.