No, they weren't
I considered it. I viewed the ongoing discussion on the topic as consideration. How are you defining the term?
I just don't see your logical fallacy. Could you dumb it down a bit for me?
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
No, they weren't
I considered it. I viewed the ongoing discussion on the topic as consideration. How are you defining the term?
I just don't see your logical fallacy. Could you dumb it down a bit for me?
By the way, the idea of putting the logo where the random quotes is? A great idea.
But we need the random quotes.
But we need the random quotes.
For what?
Okay, we are going to do away with them permanently?
That really kind of sucks.
I just like them.
Why not put the link above the "Message Center" title.
I admit, my CSS styling of the site has no quotes in it, so I'm more used to not seeing them, but I think the pointedness is quite apropos.
Okay, we are going to do away with them permanently?
The only thing I've seen suggested is Quotes Will Return When Writers Are Back To Work. Totally different vibe.
t facepalm
sumi, I'm a moron. I read your "We need them" as somehow meaning that the board doesn't function without them. Like, in a technical sense.
Sorry -- that was a total negative IQ moment.
(I like them, too.)
Okay, we are going to do away with them permanently?
I thought it was meant that it would be temporary, just for the strike?
"give the writers their money or the quotes get it."
Which is, strictly speaking, true.