Okay, we are going to do away with them permanently?
That really kind of sucks.
I just like them.
Why not put the link above the "Message Center" title.
Damn it! You know what? I'm sick of this crap. I'm sick of being the guy who eats insects and gets the funny syphilis. As of this moment, it's over. I'm finished being everybody's butt monkey!
Xander ,'Lessons'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
sumi - Nov 12, 2007 9:18:11 am PST #8175 of 10289
Art Crawl!!!
§ ita § - Nov 12, 2007 9:20:28 am PST #8176 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I admit, my CSS styling of the site has no quotes in it, so I'm more used to not seeing them, but I think the pointedness is quite apropos.
amych - Nov 12, 2007 9:20:31 am PST #8177 of 10289
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Okay, we are going to do away with them permanently?
The only thing I've seen suggested is Quotes Will Return When Writers Are Back To Work. Totally different vibe.
Steph L. - Nov 12, 2007 9:20:36 am PST #8178 of 10289
I look more rad than Lutheranism
t facepalm
sumi, I'm a moron. I read your "We need them" as somehow meaning that the board doesn't function without them. Like, in a technical sense.
Sorry -- that was a total negative IQ moment.
(I like them, too.)
Ailleann - Nov 12, 2007 9:21:20 am PST #8179 of 10289
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
Okay, we are going to do away with them permanently?
I thought it was meant that it would be temporary, just for the strike?
Connie Neil - Nov 12, 2007 9:23:34 am PST #8180 of 10289
brillig
"give the writers their money or the quotes get it."
Which is, strictly speaking, true.
Laga - Nov 12, 2007 9:26:44 am PST #8181 of 10289
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
I hate the feeling of the writers getting this outpouring of support while so many of the other folks being hit by this situation are either a last paragraph mention or not mentioned at all.
FWIW, ND. When I emailed my Mom and told her of my intentions to bring fruit to striking writers, she wrote back, "you know it's the below-the-line employees who are really being hurt by this strike." So she must have heard that somewhere.
Jon B. - Nov 12, 2007 9:37:57 am PST #8182 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
That really kind of sucks.
I just like them.
So do I. But I like the symbolism that the board is giving up something that the writers created as a show of our support.
brenda m - Nov 12, 2007 9:45:50 am PST #8183 of 10289
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
I know that there are a lot of people swept up in this, I don't mean to ignore that.
But what we are considering officially supporting is not really "the writers" - it's "the strike". It's implicit, but I don't think it should be forgotten or elided. We're not voting over whether writers are deserving of respect or adulation or whatnot - we're voting over whether to cast our support behind a specific labor action. That's why I think we need to vote on it. To me, that's also why the focus is and should be on that group, and not everyone getting a raw deal in Hollywood.
Edited to avoid totally derailing the converstation.
brenda m - Nov 12, 2007 9:46:18 am PST #8184 of 10289
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
So do I. But I like the symbolism that the board is giving up something that the writers created as a show of our support.
Yeah, me too.