Oh, I get it. You just don't like who did the rescuing, that's all. Wishin' I was your boyfriend what's-his-height. Oh wait, he's run off.

Spike ,'Potential'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Jesse - Aug 22, 2007 9:17:42 am PDT #7698 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

That also depends on the day -- Mad Men pretty clearly "belongs" in Cable Drama, but on at least one day, there was some pretty involved discussion of it in Natter.

I guess my question is really, what will people be discussing in a Procedurals thread. I mean, I watch a TON of Law & Order, but almost never have anything to say about it beyond random guest stars who have since become someone.


SailAweigh - Aug 22, 2007 10:01:16 am PDT #7699 of 10289
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

I'll definitely be in there to talk about Bones and House, if nothing else. A lot of what I'm interested in for the new season is more Boxed Set oriented. I'm sure some of the JM fans will show up in Procedurals to talk Without a Trace.


msbelle - Aug 22, 2007 10:17:15 am PDT #7700 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

Rather than shunting Monk discussion into one place, why not see where the conversation pops up?

This is kinda how I feel about all the tv talk. If people would just start talking about the shows they want to discuss(wherever they frequent), I think people will either join in and therefore a need for a thread will be shown, OR people will not join in and a lack of interest will be obvious.

It has always seemed simple to me for what is such a talked and re-talked topic.


Jesse - Aug 22, 2007 10:25:07 am PDT #7701 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I'll definitely be in there to talk about Bones and House, if nothing else.

This is kind of what I'm afraid of. I don't think those two shows together generate enough conversation for a whole thread, and you still get the spoiler problem of the bucket thread.


Vortex - Aug 22, 2007 10:35:42 am PDT #7702 of 10289
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

That also depends on the day -- Mad Men pretty clearly "belongs" in Cable Drama, but on at least one day, there was some pretty involved discussion of it in Natter.

I think that a show can be discussed in more than one thread.


Ailleann - Aug 22, 2007 10:45:35 am PDT #7703 of 10289
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda

I think that a show can be discussed in more than one thread.

Also, hadn't we previously stated that anyone can discuss anything they want, including current TV shows, in Natter? Because, you know, it's Natter?


Fred Pete - Aug 22, 2007 10:46:23 am PDT #7704 of 10289
Ann, that's a ferret.

I'll third Vortex and Ailleann. As if that were necessary.


Jesse - Aug 22, 2007 10:59:11 am PDT #7705 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Oh, of course -- I'm not saying it shouldn't be discussed wherever, just that "where the conversation pops up" won't necessarily be only one place. Which is fine, but not a defining principle.


Jon B. - Aug 22, 2007 11:04:48 am PDT #7706 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

This is kind of what I'm afraid of. I don't think those two shows together generate enough conversation for a whole thread, and you still get the spoiler problem of the bucket thread.

I have a problem with both volume and, for lack of a better word "quality" of discussion. That is, the sort of thoughtful and intelligent discussion that I rarely see outside of b.org. I haven't noticed that sort of discussion for the Procedurals; I have seen it (to some degree) for some comedies like The Office. I'm hesitant vote for a Procedurals thread for that reason.


esse - Aug 22, 2007 11:23:03 am PDT #7707 of 10289
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

I don't think those two shows together generate enough conversation for a whole thread, and you still get the spoiler problem of the bucket thread.

I'm more optimistic. Given that Bones and House were two of the largest checked shows in the poll, I think having a designated place to discuss them will actually encourage discussion.

I have nothing to say about Monk, really. I think since we already have a place to discuss it, we've already filtered possible future discussion, unless we choose to close or change the purposes of other threads. Therefore it's kind of a moot point: we voted in Cable Drama, Monk is on cable and is arguably a drama, thus it has a place. However, I'm more of the msbelle/Vortex view: conversation will develop where it develops, given the threads we have in place/are putting in place. I'm not too concerned about Monk showing up in Procedurals--if it does, hey, we want it to be more of a procedural type thing, cool. If not, it still has a place in Cable.

::shrug:: I think the limits of thread building are here, you know? We can build it, they may or may not come. If they don't, we close the thread. If they do, then its purpose is served. We can say, "oh, only these four shows are allowed here," but then we spend three hundred posts in B'cry arguing about whether Ugly Betty is a comedy or a drama. I think there are better uses of our time, frankly. So we make the threads, if we vote 'em in, and then see how they work. That's all I feel compelled to do in this procedure.