Reasons for wanting a Heroes thread:

I think Theo's original reasoning was just #2, and I've seen #1 and #3 added in since Light Bulbs opened.

The discussion is hampered by being in Boxed Set

I'm not sure I've seen this, and I'm not sure I understand it?

Nutty, I think it means that some people don't go into BS to talk about X show, because they're behind on Y show and don't want to be spoiled.

I'm not sure I've seen this, and I'm not sure I understand it?

If you haven't seen it, don't sweat it. I was just trying to be symmetrical. I'm pretty sure I saw the proposition that more/better discussion would happen in its own thread, but I'll be damned if I could Nilly it.

Is anyone willing to step up and provide cites for #2? Hec said even the anti-proliferationistas have generally agreed it's true, and I don't.

I'd call Dresden Files mediafannish, but maybe it doesn't matter.

The tagging idea sounded like the best solution, to me, if it could be done.

My eyes completely skipped over "in".

Mine too, but it's not like that's ever stopped us -- or even made the discussion any less fun!

I haven't seen reason #4 either.

#3 wasn't mentioned in the original proposal, but it's something I've seen people talk about a lot, not only in this discussion, but in Natter, Bitches, sites that are not this one. And it's a big concern for me, because I don't just see muttering about "so many messages, so little time", but also "I want to discuss show A, but I can't because of the spoilage for show B". And (as Maria (I think?) described way more eloquently than I can at the end of a grindingly slow work day with the zombie death flu) that means not only waiting for the DVD's to discuss B, which we've learned to work around in various ways, but losing the chance at what you currently want to say about A. But I'm still banging my head against whether there's a right balance between the fact that the current BS thread is simply too big for a lot of people and the fact that no proposed split is going to feel right in that same organic BS way.

OTOH, I'm quite uncomfortable with mediafannishness as a reason for anything. As an observation, a fun game, a part of the culture, a subtext-within-a-subtext, sure, bring it. As a piece of what-goes-where, it gets my hackles up because I don't see how we do that without getting into approved shows and My Fannish Is More Fannish Than Your Fannish And Mom Likes Me Better Anyway; then again, this may be because my definition of fannish has always been more like KateP's meta-heavy researchy obsessiveness than Nutty and Vonnie's squee-based definition, and I'm feeling a little defensive about how I can too identify that way even if I'm not into the pretty adolescent boys.

I think the current BS BS consensus is actually a good measure of Buffista-fannishness. And it's not the same set of activities or discussions that happen everywhere else -- but so what? Those are the shows that make us start babbling. I've never found Heroes discussion to be out of place in BS, just, well, voluminous.

And yes, I'm deliberately abusing the BS misread. And probably x-posting to the skies, given how long it's taken to type this.

I don't like the tagging idea, and not just because it requires a fair amount of design and coding, and therefore wouldn't be a near future thing, but because it's relying on me to remember to tag a post of mine. Threadsuck the current BS thread, and mentally tag the posts. I can't see it catching on and being accurate. Work all round.

Ah. I figured it would be more difficult than it sounded.

ita, see Plei: P.M. Marcontell "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" Feb 28, 2007 1:46:19 pm PST

amych: amych "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" Feb 28, 2007 1:59:38 pm PST. She is not in favor of a Heroes thread, but her fine print at the bottom implies she wouldn't be sorry to see it out of Boxed Set.

Somewhere there after Kristin, Maria (and someone before them) talked about having to skip around in BS, to avoid being spoiled for Heroes, which she can't watch now, but will watch eventually.

Whatever the first Eureka episode is in the thread, it seems to have generated more discussion than the most recent, highly regarded, episode of Heroes.

Note--I'm NOT agitating for a Eureka thread. I just think that recency might be tainting PoVs being presented as quantitative.

This relates to what I was trying to say earlier. I think we're in a temporary period in which there are quite a few shows with new episodes, which makes the problem worse that usual.

her fine print at the bottom implies she wouldn't be sorry to see it out of Boxed Set.

Eh, no. Overall volume is way too much any more for me to follow a conversation there (especially given my limited time), but it's not the show that's unwelcome.