Right. I'm thinking what Jesse is thinking -- if there aren't 10 indignant people within 24 hours, then it's not worth a warning. Extending it to 48 strikes me as lowering the bar.
Because, really, what I've seen so far in our various stompinesses is that 15 people will jump over to Bureaucracy at the same time, or that 1 person will, and suddenly 25 people say "I was thinking that too and didn't dare say it!" So, I am for the shorter time.
All sounds reasonable. As I noted in Bureaucracy, I would like clarification that the people who have brought it up in-thread needn't be the person who brings it to bureaucracy. Cause I can envision a situation where the poster has upset lots of people but no one wants to the be bad guy. So someone, like me, posts in Bureaucracy.
Kat, I thought I made that clear in my new wording? no?
Ok. Jesse and Nutty got me. I was ready to move over to 48, because I thought maybe I was just being too pushy, but when oh when do we not have 10 posters within a 24 hour period?
if there aren't 10 indignant people within 24 hours
Looking at the stats, one would be ill-advised to get pissed off early Sunday morning. Pretty much a tiny fraction of the traffic of the rest of the week.
Yeah, that's reasonable, Kat. If one person attempts a social enforcement on-thread, and it clearly fails, then I don't mind if it's someone else who brings it to Bureaucracy. After all, the whole point is that it's more than one person with an axe to grind.
when do we not have 10 posters within a 24 hour period?
That would require unanimity. We never have that.
but....but... we will for my stuff.
- ms. rightallthetimemoveitalongpants
Hey! Stop calling me longpants.
But honestly, Sundays are dead days. What's the downside to 48 hours, especially if one
usually
gets the support in a fraction of that?
I thought that too the first time I saw moveitalongpants. And, I have been calling you that in my head ever since.
Also I echo Dana's request that you not kill me.