All sounds reasonable. As I noted in Bureaucracy, I would like clarification that the people who have brought it up in-thread needn't be the person who brings it to bureaucracy. Cause I can envision a situation where the poster has upset lots of people but no one wants to the be bad guy. So someone, like me, posts in Bureaucracy.
Mal: I call you back? Wash: No, Mal. You didn't. Zoe: I take full responsibility, cap.
'Out Of Gas'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Kat - Apr 14, 2003 3:09:51 pm PDT #619 of 10289
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
msbelle - Apr 14, 2003 3:12:28 pm PDT #620 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Kat, I thought I made that clear in my new wording? no?
Ok. Jesse and Nutty got me. I was ready to move over to 48, because I thought maybe I was just being too pushy, but when oh when do we not have 10 posters within a 24 hour period?
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2003 3:12:58 pm PDT #621 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
if there aren't 10 indignant people within 24 hours
Looking at the stats, one would be ill-advised to get pissed off early Sunday morning. Pretty much a tiny fraction of the traffic of the rest of the week.
Nutty - Apr 14, 2003 3:13:04 pm PDT #622 of 10289
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."
Yeah, that's reasonable, Kat. If one person attempts a social enforcement on-thread, and it clearly fails, then I don't mind if it's someone else who brings it to Bureaucracy. After all, the whole point is that it's more than one person with an axe to grind.
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2003 3:13:36 pm PDT #623 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
when do we not have 10 posters within a 24 hour period?
That would require unanimity. We never have that.
msbelle - Apr 14, 2003 3:16:11 pm PDT #624 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
but....but... we will for my stuff.
- ms. rightallthetimemoveitalongpants
§ ita § - Apr 14, 2003 3:20:18 pm PDT #625 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Hey! Stop calling me longpants.
But honestly, Sundays are dead days. What's the downside to 48 hours, especially if one usually gets the support in a fraction of that?
Daisy Jane - Apr 14, 2003 3:26:31 pm PDT #626 of 10289
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."
I thought that too the first time I saw moveitalongpants. And, I have been calling you that in my head ever since.
Also I echo Dana's request that you not kill me.
Cindy - Apr 14, 2003 3:39:44 pm PDT #627 of 10289
Nobody
Daisy Jane - Apr 14, 2003 3:44:11 pm PDT #628 of 10289
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."
I don't think the discussion will be over at 10 and I'm not sure it should be. Buffistas like to add their 2 cents, and I don't see the good in stopping them.
This is especially true when the process gets to #4, I think.
Again, I'm just feeling things out, and not really married to my opinions just yet.