Natter so overwhelmed me in volume now that i have a job, I unsubscribed and visit only on occasion.
It seems to me that a thread that can take some of the pressure off of Natter and Bitches would be a good thing.
t shrug.
We're still working on a plan, but so far it involves being sent to prison and becoming somebody's bitch.
Fred ,'Just Rewards (2)'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
DCJensen - Aug 21, 2005 1:17:02 pm PDT #5859 of 10289
All is well that ends in pizza.
Jessica - Aug 21, 2005 1:22:47 pm PDT #5860 of 10289
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
It seems to me that a thread that can take some of the pressure off of Natter and Bitches would be a good thing.
Is there seriously any chance of a new thread having this effect, though? Historically, new threads have always meant more volume. If splitting off Movies and Music didn't slow down Natter, I really doubt Veronica can do it.
bon bon - Aug 21, 2005 4:26:20 pm PDT #5861 of 10289
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Jessica's right. Posting expands to fill the space allotted.
Jon B. - Aug 21, 2005 4:33:04 pm PDT #5862 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Here's the text I plan to use in the ballot. Comments?
Proposed: Should we add a Veronica Mars thread?
Jim writes: I propose that we have a VM thread. Purely selfishly, I can't keep up with Natter these days, and I want to discuss VM in the kind of depth you only get round here.
YES
NO
NO PREFERENCE
Nilly - Aug 21, 2005 10:08:19 pm PDT #5863 of 10289
Swouncing
Jon, it looks simple and direct and good to me. Oh, and my profile address is good for counting.
If splitting off Movies and Music didn't slow down Natter, I really doubt Veronica can do it.
Actually, I would be very curious to see statistics about the flow of Natter before/after those threads were created. Oh, and we then can analyze it based on the number of active posters, or the average total posting flow, or - OK, I'll shut up now. No, first I'll tell myself that ita and the other techies who are doing such a wonderful job already have their hands full (both real hands and, um, screen ones) so they don't need any math requests, and that I have enough numbers to play with at work and I don't need to ask people for more. And now I'll shut up.
Jim - Aug 21, 2005 10:09:05 pm PDT #5864 of 10289
Ficht nicht mit Der Raketemensch!
Both. I do think the board needs live show threads to sustain the feel, and I think VM is a really logical choice; it's the first show since Buffy - including Angel & Firefly - to feel even remotely like it. And no, my comment on preserving the original TT idea of the community was a generalism, not a comment to you.
Jon B. - Aug 22, 2005 3:25:39 am PDT #5865 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Hear Ye Hear Ye
Voting is now open for the following proposal:
Proposed: Should we add a Veronica Mars thread?
Jim writes: I propose that we have a VM thread. Purely selfishly, I can't keep up with Natter these days, and I want to discuss VM in the kind of depth you only get round here.
Discussion for this proposal starts here.
Voting closes Thursday, August 25, at 6 AM (PST).
(questions should be posted in Bureaucracy)
And I am now closing this thread.
(Note: edited by DX to include correct date.)
§ ita § - Aug 25, 2005 11:51:13 am PDT #5866 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
From le nubian:
Here's my proposal that I think needs discussion:
I would like to become a bit more involved in some of the TV discussions here, but I can't get to Natter in time for anything I have to say to mean anything. I know there are/have been discussions about thread proliferation and when individual shows need threads. I am interested in further discussion that may help address various peoples' needs/wants.
Embedded in this are two options as I see them: 1) A Fall TV thread which would cover new series that debut September, October, or November; or 2) a New Series Thread that could encapsulate all the new series airing from September 1, 2005-August 31, 2006.
The second option could capture discussion of "Prison Break", "Reunion", mid-season replacement series, and summer series.
I know a thread for Option 1 may be short-lived, however, knowing y'all buffistas, we might be on thread #4 by the time Christmas comes.
So essentially the two options proposed differ in terms of what folks may most desire: long-running threads (option 2) or more concentrated discussion (option 1). Neither thread, in my view, would cover continuing series.
Tom Scola - Aug 25, 2005 11:57:35 am PDT #5867 of 10289
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.
So, basically what's being proposed is another Boxed Set.
I find that trying to keep up in Boxed Set with the shows I like while ignoring the shows I don't to be too much of a hassle. I guess my vote would be no at this point.
Other people don't seem to mind Boxed Set that much, though.
§ ita § - Aug 25, 2005 11:58:44 am PDT #5868 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I'm weeks behind in Boxed Set because I've only seen up to ep 3 of BSG so far.
That whitefont question is key, I think.