So if we're not voting, what happens? Does the consensus that it's nice for secondary logins to make it know who they are in some way get written down or adopted as policy or anything, or did we just basically waste four days?
I'm not trying to start anything, just genuinely curious.
I think it could be, just like the not signing of posts, a community effect thing. So, the talking wasn't a waste, even without the vote.
Thanks, Deena. I think it will be harder to see a community effect on something rare like secondary logins than on something as obvious as nt signing posts, but I guess we can just wait 'till the next sockpuoppet and see what happens.
You're welcome.
I think it will be harder to see a community effect.
Probably. I don't see a better solution, though.
As far as I know if the proposal is pulled then there is no action to be taken. If we want an action then it will have to come up in B'cacy. It does not need to be a proposal, as we've altered things on the board without them before, or it could be a new proposal. If this one is pulled, then that is where this proposal stops.
At least that's my understanding, I could be very very wrong.
Check out #31.... It's anti-sock puppets too. 213 Things Skippy Shouldn't Do
d, I have a feeling you read cleolinda. ;-}
Why yes, I do. All thanks to you and Lost Recapping, btw!
Proposal for a Veronica mars thread by Jim:
I can't recall the process, but yeah, I propose that we have a VM thread. Purely selfishly, I can't keep up with Natter these days, and I want to discuss VM in the kind of depth you only get round here.
Jim "Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?" Aug 18, 2005 7:51:23 am PDT