(ie. a few posts as the sockpuppet, after being "warned" by someone).

Don't forget the first "try to work it out in thread" step. Or is that presumed to be "Tell me who you are, sockpuppet!" "No, you should guess," as a failed "working it out in thread?

yeah - so ok - is THAT document (cheesebutt in LINKS or linked to from the FAQ?)

FTR - here is the voting procedure:

- No other proposals are currently on the table.

- You post a formal proposal (use words like wherefore!) in Bureaucracy.

- Four other people say "I second that".

- Someone in Bureaucracy volunteers to count votes.

- A Stompy Foot opens Light Bulb immediately.

- You post in Press the text of your proposal, and link to Light Bulb.

- You post the text of your proposal in Light Bulb.

- Light Bulb discussion for (roughly) 4 days.

- You take the text of your proposal and phrase it for the final ballot (You may change the language from your original proposal if you choose, or not).

- You send the final ballot text to Jon B.

- Jon B. notifies you that the web ballot is ready and gives you the link.

- You post in Press the final ballot text, the link to the ballot, and the dates and times of voting opening and closing (3 days total).

- You post in Light Bulb the same as you've just posted in Press, ending discussion in Light Bulb.

- You wait for the voting period to end and the vote-counter to count.

- The vote-counter reposts the final ballot text with the results (number of votes, winning vote, percentages).

______ I am for following the guidelines as they are set forth, especially since nothing changes until that time and nothing needs to be changed right this very second.

I am for following the guidelines as they are set forth, especially since nothing changes until that time and nothing needs to be changed right this very second.

We have, by precedent, allowed proposals to be withdrawn without voting.

Are you saying that should not have happened/should not happen here?

Well, we could have Betsy propose that she's a weirdo. We could vote on that.

Doesn't look like the fact of this particular discussion ever got posted in Press, by the way. Past the point of usefulness now, I suppose.

Identifying in profile and adding that to the FAQ seems like a reasonable compromise. Don't particularly feel the need to vote formally on it.

Well, I think a withdrawl of a proposal that leaves the board as is, is different than stopping discussion on a proposal and deciding to make a policy change without a vote.

I am on dial-up and so didn't go all the way through the cheesebutt document, but is there anything in there about what type of board changes require a vote?

At the very least - the proposal needs to be posted in Press to alert anyone who would like to be a part of the discussion. I would hate to stop discussion before that.

I feel like proposing a group hug, but I'll resist. How about some calm, weary smiles of respect and congratulations on solving another one?

Huh. Go to class, and something's proposed and consensed before you can blink.

I dislike the "not in on the joke" feeling that sockpuppets give me, but I'm profoundly uncomfortable with making a rule that says you CANNOT have ANY OTHER LOGIN, you big LOSER (except for these people we've made exceptions for).

I realize the issue is pretty much decided, but I'm with ND and DX and possibly other initialed people.

yes, this is sort of a quick consensing with no announcement. I think there might be more interest in the topic if folks knew it was happening. I'm not saying we have to put it to a vote, but I'd feel a hell of a lot more comfortable if the discussion was on the table long enough for more people to find it, or, better, be alerted to it.

Well, we could have Betsy propose that she's a weirdo. We could vote on that.

I'm good with that.