I always TiVo That Other One, myself.

I dunno, Cindy. I don't think it makes sense to put it all on one ballot. Or maybe I just think that it wouldn't hurt to do a non-binding poll to see how much interest there is in creating several new show threads before we, in essence, commit to creating new show threads. I mean, how many days of discussion is there supposed to be prior to any given vote? Four days, right? Why not do a two- or three-day poll during that time?

The question about creating new threads doesn't have to be binding, does it?

I'm not sure what you mean, JenP. Votes are binding, polls are not.

Burrell, I know, because what you're suggesting is what I thought we were doing.

Lyra, it reads like you just want to get it over with (v. understandable). What do you think of Burrell's suggestion? It doesn't sound like it would lengthen it, any.

I always TiVo That Other One, myself.

How would spoilers be handled in these proposed TV threads?

I thought we were discussing wording the poll and including a general question about whether or not to create new threads at all. Where Allyson mentioned "inlcude a no new threads option" I took to mean in the poll. Then in response to amych's question, my response was in regard to creating a poll with the no new threads option, but also being able to voice show choices for the possibility that "yes" was the more popular answer to the thread question.

If "no new threads" is the polled preference, well, the show results are sort of moot.

ETA: If I said voting, I meant voting in the poll, so non-binding.

How would spoilers be handled in these proposed TV threads?

If they're to be a thread per show, I'd say we use the standard NAFDA/if-it's-aired definition we had for Buffy, Angel, etc. No whitefonting, but no spoilers either. Maybe consider turning the old B/A spoilers thread into a more general spoiler zone -- I miss that subcommunity in the absence of new dirt, and my sense of the spoiler-ho gestalt has always been that most companions are good with being spoiled on multiple shows, including ones they don't watch.

I could be wrong on that, of course.

I'm not trying to introduce a new idea, but I'd like a Showtime Sunday thread. I think Showtime shows Dead Like Me, QaF, Huff and The L Word in specific, rotate, so that there are always new episodes. So if they had one thread, we could talk about whichever show was airing at the time and it would be sort of like a show specific thread, but not. I'd love to talk about DLM in particular, think I'd like to watch Huff, and enjoy the L Word. I haven't yet gotten into QaF, but I know others have.

Wow. What made sense to me a half an hour ago is now completely confusing. I thought the poll was to determine interest in threads for TV shows. So, a vote for "No new threads for TV shows" makes sense as an option alongside the various show thread options. But I don't think the poll results should then immediately be used to create threads (should the poll results be supportive of new show threads).

I think, if the poll shows sufficient interest in creating new show threads, then the determination of which shows get threads should be taken to a vote. This would then give people who voted "No new threads" a chance to at least have a say in which new threads are created. I think this takes care of amych's issue, right?