So before midnight we decide on the method of voting on a choice of 6,4 or 3 months. I suppose I can suck and skim for empassioned arguments for each time period and the method of deciding same. I don't really have to read almost 1200 messages to get the major points, right?
How about we decide each time we have a vote how long before we discuss it again? BWAHAHAHAHA
Sixists, Threeps and Fourmongers. Why can't we all get along?
I still don't see anyone really against doing an instant runoff (i.e. prfffmmmmng), so I went ahead and coded up a ballot. It's a dummy ballot. The "Send" button won't work until midnight. Comments on content?
Yeah, maybe put at the bottom a feedback question. Did you understand this ballot yes/no/don't care?
Yes/No isn't very useful. If folks have questions, they can ask about it here or in Bureaucracy.
Yes/No isn't very useful. If folks have questions, they can ask about it here or in Bureaucracy.
It's the talking about it we're trying to avoid. I thought maybe an informal survey of how many people the PV really squicks might be a good idea and very easy to do.
In fact, why not put an informal survey rider on other ballots too. How many Buffistas are lefties/righties? How many Buffistas eat rice with a spoon/fork? Etc. It could make this process a little more fun.
In other words, I think it's fine.
It is lovely Jon.
I suppose that I am the one staying up and posting the link?
Oh yeah, sorry, no way I can stay up. Any West Coasters?
In fact, why not put an informal survey rider on other ballots too. How many Buffistas are lefties/righties? How many Buffistas eat rice with a spoon/fork? Etc. It could make this process a little more fun.
I am so fond of this idea. Really.
I usually vote in the first couple minutes, but since I missed 6 days of discussion I will probably be voting on day 3. I feel so out of the loop. I am so far behind I am downloading last week's Angel that I forgot about. Yikes.