t offtopic

So some minor resentment that we've got a Farscape/due South/Smallville thread which has become the stealth Stargate thread.

Stargate was grandfathered in -- I think it was already under discussion in the Farscape thread -- what were you going to do? Ban it when they were combined?

t /offtopic

Yeah. In fact, I think we took that attitude about similar shows for that thread. We kinda knew we might have some additional tv discussion there, we just didn't want to make it a Big Important Issue where the existence of the thread itself would make it inherently a general tv thread. I think if someone started up with discussion about NHL playoffs (what, it's on tv!) in that thread it would get thwoshed pretty quickly. Know it when we see it, I suppose.

I've now written (EDIT: and deleted) two different posts, both several paragraphs long, to attempt to express my thoughts. I am now going to force myself to use three short sentences (after this one) to say what I need to say, because I don't need any more than that.

I will vote against a Politics thread.

I believe it will quickly lead to unhappiness that will dwarf that of recent days.

I believe that because I can easily see myself fomenting the unhappiness.

As the proverb goes, Don't Get Me Started. (All right, four sentences. And a fragment. Two. Four.)

I believe that because I can easily see myself fomenting the unhappiness.

I'm glad to see you saying this, because I think it is true of myself as well. Having, rather naturally for this group, strongly held views, it is unlikely that I personally will be able to discuss hot-button issues dispassionately. I do hope I would be civil. But I rather reckon I would get my ire up a time or two.

And I would not want to contribute to the unhappiness of the board.

We kinda knew we might have some additional tv discussion there, we just didn't want to make it a Big Important Issue where the existence of the thread itself would make it inherently a general tv thread.

It is this very attitude that I consider hand-waving and denial. The dainty little steps around what to put in the slug. But it is the de facto genre TV show, and I'd just as soon see it labeled as such. And if genre tv shows get their own thread (which they essentially) do, then how is that fair that other shows don't? Short answer: it isn't fair. And it's completely arbitrary and flies in the face of folks who say they don't want a general TV thread. There's no defense for it except precedence and grandfathering. But now I'm saying grandfathering has created inequities.

Is it surprising grandfathering created inequity? You take a system that's out of equilibrium, freeze bits and try and ensure additional bits maintain balance -- you're almost guaranteeing inequity.

t offtopic As for it being the genre TV discussion thread -- I have never started a discussion about a genre TV show in there that wasn't grandfathered in. Period. I've continued ones, (because where can you thread-nanny one to?) but try to limit that. I think it's unfair to call it handwaving and denial when at least one of us (possibly more) are respecting precisely the decision that was made. t /offtopic

As for it being the genre TV discussion thread -- I have never started a discussion about a genre TV show in there that wasn't grandfathered in. Period. I've continued ones, (because where can you thread-nanny one to?) but try to limit that. I think it's unfair to call it handwaving and denial when at least one of us (possibly more) are respecting precisely the decision that was made.

"Grandfathering" in this instance becomes the handwave. Stargate is not mentioned in the thread title or header [edit: okay, it's in the header only] or slug. Previously "grandfathering" referred to Threads We Had At WX With Their Own Culture. Now we're using it to institutionalize what was basically thread-drift.

edited to change "you're" to "we're" because I'm talking more about the group decision that lead to Boxed Set, not just how ita uses it.

And if genre tv shows get their own thread (which they essentially) do, then how is that fair that other shows don't?

Because this community started out as one Buffy thread. Genre television is what brought us together.

I'm still on the fence about the politics thread.

Now you're using it to instutitionalize what was basically thread-drift.

Can you cite me situations in which thread-nannying has been enforced outside of right hand threads and incipient spoilers?

Because you seem to be suggesting it should have been done -- that conversations routinely taking place in a certain location be booted out.

I don't see the precedent for that. "I've started so I'll finish -- no foul" seems much more typical.

eta: And look -- I'm thread-nannying myself right now. I don't think this belongs here, and would be happy to discuss it somewhere else.

Stargate is not mentioned in the thread title or header or slug.

But it's mentioned in the description, or whatever it's called, that you see at the very beginning of the thread. In fact, that's why I never thought it was an issue to post about it. Or, in fact, other shows in passing. I mean, I don't know which description is supposed to be the uber description, but this seems pretty broad to me in terms of allowable topics:

"A topic for the discussion of Farscape, Smallville, and Due South. Beware possible invasions of Stargate, Highlander, or pretty much anything else that captures our fancy. Expect Adult Content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex."

t /off topic